FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI EFEKTIVITAS PENGAJARAN MEMBANGUN MODEL MENTAL BACAAN BAGI GURU SEKOLAH DASAR

Main Article Content

Sri Tiatri
Jap Tji Beng
Claudia Fiscarina
Hartinah Dinata

Abstract

Building Mental Models Teaching during reading is beneficial to improve students' reading and thinking skills. However, this teaching was not popular because the implementation was complicated. Efforts to develop learning models to build mental models for teachers are continuously being pursued. This study examines the factors that can affect the effectiveness of teacher training. Data is collected through documentation of the entire training process, starting from preparation, implementation, and completion. Interviews and in-depth observations were held in this in-house training process. Participants of this in-house training are a group of primary school teachers in Salatiga (10 teachers) and Tanjungpandan (10 teachers). The results show, there are 5 factors that need to be considered to achieve the effectiveness of in-house training of building mental models: (a) principal support, (b) association with certification, (c) training implementation time, (d) teachers' prior knowledge, (e) teacher habits when teaching in classroom, especially regarding assessment. Based on the evaluation of this training, the material presented was considered quite easy by the teacher. However, there is a tendency that teachers' habits in assessment affect the learning to build mental models that are carried out. There are habits that have the potential to interfere with the freedom of thought that are being developed. Based on the results of this study, it is hoped that the teaching carried out by the teacher can encourage students to think independently, not solely focusing on academic achievement. 



Pengajaran Membangun Model Mental saat membaca bermanfaat meningkatkan kemampuan membaca dan berpikir siswa. Namun pengajaran ini tidak populer karena pelaksanaannya yang tidak sederhana. Upaya mengembangkan model pembelajaran membangun model mental bagi para guru terus diupayakan. Penelitian ini mengkaji faktor-faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi efektivitas pelatihan guru. Data dikumpulkan melalui dokumentasi seluruh proses pelatihan, mulai dari persiapan, pelaksanaan, dan penyelesaian. Wawancara dan observasi mendalam dilaksanakan dalam proses in house training. Partisipan in house training dalam penelitian ini adalah kelompok guru SD di Salatiga (10 guru) dan Tanjungpandan (10 guru). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan 5 faktor yang perlu dipertimbangkan untuk mencapai keefektifan in house training pembelajaran membangun model mental: (a) dukungan kepala sekolah, (b) pengaitan dengan sertifikasi, (c) waktu pelaksanaan pelatihan, (d) pengetahuan awal para guru, (e) kebiasaan guru dalam pengajaran di kelas, khususnya mengenai penilaian. Berdasarkan evaluasi terhadap pelatihan ini, materi yang disampaikan dianggap cukup mudah oleh guru. Namun ada kecenderungan bahwa kebiasaan guru dalam penilaian mempengaruhi pembelajaran membangun model mental yang dilaksanakan.  Ada kebiasaan yang berpotensi mengganggu kemerdekaan berpikir yang sedang dikembangkan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, diharapkan pengajaran yang dilakukan guru dapat mendorong siswa untuk merdeka berpikir, tidak semata-mata berfokus pada prestasi akademik saja.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Sri Tiatri, Universitas Tarumanagara

 

 

References

Avvisati, F., Echazarra, A., Givord, P., & Schwabe, M. (2019). The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018: Country Note. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf

Bobek, E., & Tversky, B. (2016). Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6

Diban, A. S. (2012). Mental models. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 2200-2204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_586

Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a

Fahmi, M., Maulana, A., & Yusuf, A. A. (2011). Teacher Certification in Indonesia: A Confusion of Means and Ends (No. 201107). Retrieved from https:// http://ceds.fe.unpad.ac.id/publications/wopeds/182-teacher-certification-in-indonesia-a-confusion-of-means-and-ends.html

Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147- 164). New York: Macmillan.

Francey, G., & Cain, K. (2015). Effect of imagery training on children’s comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Educational Research, 108(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.824869

Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198

Jalal, F., Samani, M., Chang, M. C., Stevenson, R., Ragatz, A. B., & Negara, S. D. (2009). Teacher certification in Indonesia: A Strategy for Teacher Quality Improvement (No. 48578). Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/705901468283513711/teacher-certification-in-indonesia-a-strategy-for-teacher-quality-improvement

Lin, L., Lee, C. H., Kalyuga, S., Wang, Y., Guan, S., & Wu, H. (2017). The effect of learner-generated drawing and imagination in comprehending a science text. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143796

Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J. M., Chiu, M. M., & Bateman, S. M. (2013). Teachers’ spatial literacy as visualization, reasoning, and communication. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.012

Nergis, A. (2013). Exploring the factors that affect reading comprehension of EAP learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.09.001

Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436273

Smith, T. E., Rama, P. S., & Helms, J. R. (2018). Teaching critical thinking in a GE class: A flipped model. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.010

Stein, K. C., Macaluso, M., & Stanulis, R. N. (2016). The interplay between principal leadership and teacher leader efficacy. Journal of School Leadership, 26(6), 1002–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461602600605

Sukmaswati, I, Lian, B., & Wardiah, D. (2020). The influence of principal’s leadership and teacher’s performance on student’s achievement. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 20(1), 247–254. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341432747_The_Influence_of_Principal%27s_Leadership_and_Teacher%27s_Performance_on_Student%27_Achievement

Tiatri, S., & Jap, T. B. (2019). Materi Lokakarya Pembelajaran Membaca dan Berpikir. Unpublished work.

Trehearne, M. P., & Doctorow, R. (2005). Reading comprehension: Strategies that work. Comprehensive Literacy Resource: Grade 3-6 (Chapter 2). https://www.hand2mind.com/pdf/miriam/ch2_clr3_ 6.pdf

Wang, L., Lawson, M. J., & Curtis, D. D. (2015). The effect of image quality training on reading comprehension of EFL students using the keyword method. Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541718

Williamson, V. M., & José, T. J. (2008). The effects of a two-year molecular visualization experience on teachers’ attitudes, content knowledge, and spatial ability. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(5), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p718