PENGARUH FAKTOR-FAKTOR PROFESIONAL, PERSONAL, LINGKUNGAN, TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI DAN KEPUASAN TERHADAP PRESTASI MAHASISWA MELALUI PENGGUNAAN E-LEARNING BERKELANJUTAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penggunaan e-learning berkelanjutan sangat urgen diciptakan dan dikembangkan di setiap lembaga pendidikan formal karena dapat memutus rantai penyebaran covid-19 sekaligus meningkatkan prestasi peserta didik pada era normal baru ini. Dengan demikian perlu diketahui faktor-faktor determinan yang dapat mewujudkan penggunaan e-learning berkelanjutan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk membuktikan secara empiris pengaruh faktor-faktor profesional, personal, lingkungan, teknologi informasi dan kepuasan terhadap prestasi mahasiswa di Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Trisakti melalui penggunaan e-learning berkelanjutan sebagai variabel mediasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode kuantitatif melalui penyebaran 50 item kuesioner berskala Likert 5 poin via google form kepada 279 responden. Data penelitian dianalisis dengan analisis deskriptif dan pengujian hipotesis dengan menggunakan SEM. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa faktor determinan yang paling signifikan mempengaruhi penggunaan e-learning berkelanjutan adalah faktor-faktor personal. Terbukti secara empiris juga bahwa penggunaan e-learning berkelanjutan mempengaruhi prestasi mahasiswa, sehingga perlu diberi perhatian serius pada faktor-faktor personal. Hasil penelitian diharapkan berkontribusi pada pihak manajemen FEB untuk menciptkan dan mengembangkan e-learning yang mendukung efektivitas dan prestasi mahasiswa. Saran untuk penelitian selanjutnya perlu memberikan pemahaman tentang e-learning sebelum membuat penelitian dengan tema yang sama atau membuat penelitian tentang tingkat literasi terhadap cakupan makna e-learning berkelanjutan.
Sustainable use of e-learning is very urgent created and developed in any formal education institutions because it can break the chain of covid-19 while improving the achievement of students in this new normal era. Therefore, it takes determinant factors that can realize the use of sustainable e-learning. The purpose of this study is to empirically prove the influence of professional, personal, environmental, information technology and satisfaction factors on student achievement at the Faculty of Economics and Business, Trisakti University through the use of sustainable e-learning as a mediating variable. The method used is quantitative method through the deployment of 50 item 5-point Likert scale questionnaire via google form to 279 respondents. The research data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and hypothesis testing using SEM. The results of this study prove that the most significant determinant factors affecting the use of sustainable e-learning are personal factors. It is also empirically proven that the use of sustainable e-learning affects student achievement. Therefore, it is necessary to pay serious attention to personal factors. This finding is expected can give contribution for management of Faculty of Economics and Business for creating and developing e-learning which supports effectiveness and student performance. Therefore, the suggestion is that further research needs to provide an understanding of e-learning before making research with the same theme or making research on the level of literacy on the scope of meaning of sustainable e-learning.
Article Details
References
Abumandour, E. T. (2020). Public Libraries’ Role in Supporting E-learning and Spreading Lifelong Education: A Case Study. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. Retrieved October 12, 2020, from https://www.emerald.com/insight/2397-7604.htm.
Achour, M., Khalil, S. B. A., Ahmad, B. B., Nor, M. R. M., & Yusoff, M. Y. Z. B. M. (2017). Management and Supervisory Support as A Moderator of Work-family Demands and Women’s Well-being. Humanomics, 33(3): 335-356. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/emehumpps/h-02-2017-0024.htm
Alam, A. & Ahmad, M. (2018). The Role of Teachers’ Emotional Intelligence in Enhancing Student Achievemet. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 12(1): 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-08-2015-0134
Al-Harbi, K. A. (2011). E-learning in the Saudi Tertiary Education: Potential and Challenges. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9: 31-46.https://doi.org/10-1016/j.aci.2010.03.002
Almekhlafy, S. S. A. (2020). Online Learning of English Language Course via Blackboard at Saudi Universities in the Era of COVID-19: Perception and Use. PSU Research Review. Retrieved November 16, 2020, from http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode.
Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13 (1): 56-71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1078
Blaschke, L. M. & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A Holistic Framework for Creating Twenty-First-Century Self-determined Learners, dalam Gros, B., Kinshuk dan Maina, M. (Eds). The Future Ubiquitous Learning, Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Boros, S. & van Gorp, L. (2017). Networks in Professional Groups: A Matter of Connection or Self-exile? Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 23(7/8): 318-332.https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2016-0044
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1): 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Diño, M. J. S. & de Guzman, A. B. (2015). Using Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Predicting Behavioral Intention for Telehealth Use among Filipino Elderly. Educational Gerontology, 41(1): 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2014.917236
Doucet, A., Netolicky, D., Timmers, K., & Tuscano, F. J. (2020). Thinking about Pedagogy in an Unfolding Pandemic: An Independent Report on Approaches to Distance Learning During COVID-19 School Closures, 29 Maret. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://issuu.com/educationinternational/docs/2020_research_covid-19_eng
Elfaki, N. K., Abdulraheem, I., & Abdulrahim, R. (2019). Impact of E-learning Vs Traditional Learning on Students’ Performance and Attitude. International Medical Journal, 24 (3): 225-233. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338528127_Impact_of_e-learning_vs_traditional_learning_on_students'_performance_and_attitude
Fatoni, Arifiati, N., Nurkhayaati, E., Nurdiawati, E., Fidziah, Pamungkas, G., Adha, S., Irawan, Purwanto, A., Julyanto, O., & Azizi, E. (2020). University Student Online Learning System during Covid-19 Pandemic: Advantages, Constraints and Solutions. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7): 570-576. https://www.sysrevpharm.org/articles/university-students-online-learning-system-during-covid19-pandemic-advantages-constraints-and-solutions.pdf
Foroughi, B., Iranmanesh, M., & Hyun, S. S. (2019). Understanding the Determinants of Mobile Banking Continuance Usage Intention. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(6): 1015-1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2018-0237
Hase & Kenyon. (2001). From Andragogy to Heutagogy. Original ultiBASE publication. Retrieved November 15, 2020, from http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htm.
Hernandez, B., Montaner, T., Sese, F. J., & Urquizu, P. (2011). The Role of Social Motivations in E-learning: How Do They Affect Usage and Success of ICT Interactive Tools? Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 2224-2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.001
Hsu, H., Liu, F., Tsou, H., & Chen, L. (2019). Openness of Technology Adoption, Top Management Support and Service Innovation: A Social Innovation Perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(2): 575-590. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2017-0068
Indartono, S. I. (2017). Metodologi Riset SDM. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Ja’ashan, M. M. N. H. (2015). Perceptions and Attitudes towards Blended Learning for Englihs Courses: A Case Study of Students at University of Bisha. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 8(9): 40-50. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n9p40
Kapo, A., Mujkic, A., Turulja, L., & Kova?evi?, J. (2020). Continuous E-learning at the Workplace: The Passport for Future of Knowledge. Information Technology & People. Retrieved October 14, 2020, from https://www.emerald.com/insight/0959-3845.htm
Kheruniah, A. E. (2013). A Teacher Personality Competence Contribution to A Student Study Motivation and Discipline to Fiqh Lesson. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2(2): 108-112. https://www.ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR-0213-5760
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education, From Pedagogy to Andragogy. New York: Cambridge.
Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1): 60-70.
Lai, H. & Chen, C. (2011). Factors Influencing Secondary School Teachers’ Adoption of Teaching Blogs. Computers & Education, 56: 948-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.010
Lee, M. (2010). Explaining and Predicting Users’ Continuance Intention toward E-learning: An Extension of the Expectation-confirmation Model. Computers & Education, 54: 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
Levin, R. I., & Rubin, D. S. (1991). Statistics for Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., & Wathen, S. A. (2014). Teknik-teknik Statistika dalam Bisnis dan Ekonomi (15 ed.). (R. B. Hartarto, Trans.) Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Liu, M. & Liu, C. (2020). The Adoption of E-learning Beyond MOOCs for Higher Education. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management. Retrieved November 16, 2020, from https://www.emerald.com/insight/1834-7649.htm .
Moradi, M., Tarighi, H., Hosseinipour, R., & Saravani, M. (2020). Factors Influencing the Learning of Accounting Information System (AIS), Evidence from Iranian Students. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 36(3): 226-245. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-02-2019-0014
Moawad, R. A. (2020). Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Academic Stress in University Students. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1/2), Retrieved October 5, 2020 from https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup1/
Nikolovska, A. I., Grizev, A., & Iliev, A. (2020). History of Heutagogy as A Self-determinated Learning. 2nd International Scientific Conference MILCON’19, Skopje. Retrieved November 16, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340413627
Oye, N.D., Salleh, M., & Iahad, N. A. (2011). Challenges of E-learning in Negerian University Education Based on the Experience of Developed Countries. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 3(2): 39-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/ijmit.2011.3204
Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Duyck, W., & Duyck, P. (2011). Predicting Secondary School Teachers’ Acceptance and Use of a Digital Learning Environment: A Cross-sectional Study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1): 568-575. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3 ed.). New York: Free Press.
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business, A Skill-Building Approach (4 ed.). USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business, A Skill-Building Approach (7 ed.). UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Shehzadi, S., Nisar, Q. A., Hussain, M. S., Basheer, M. F., Hameed, W. U., &
Chaudhry, N. I. (2020). The Role of Digital Learning toward Student’s Satisfaction and University Brand Image at Education Institutes of Pakistan: A Post-effect of COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Sutdies. Retrieved Desember 10, 2020, from https://www.emerald.com/insight/2046-3162.htm
Shi, L., Yao, X., & Wu, W. (2020). Perceived University Support, Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy, Heterogeneous Entrepreneurial Intentions in Entrepreneurship Education, the Moderating Role of the Chinese Sense of Face. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economics, 12(2): 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-04-2019-0040
Sidratulmunthah, Hussain, S., & Malik, M. I. (2018). Towards Nurturing the Entrepreneurial Intentions of Neglected Female Business Students of Pakistan through Proactive Personality, Self-Efficacy and University Support Factors. Asia Pasific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(3): 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-03-2018-0015
Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryaman, M., Cahyono, Y., Mulansyah, D., Bustani, O., Suryani, P., Fahlevi, M., Pramono, R., Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Munthe, A. P., Juliana., & Harimurti, S. M. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemic and Home Online Learning System: Does It Affect the Quality of Pharmacy School Learning? Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(8): 524-530. https://search.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/en/covidwho-846299
Taiwo, A. A. & Downe, A. G. (2013). The Theory of User Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): A Meta-analytic Review of Empirical Findings. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49(1): 48-58.
Tayyaba, S. (2012). Rural-urban Gaps in Academic Achievement, Schooling Conditions, Student, and Teachers’ Characteristics in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(1): 6-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211194356
Trivedi, R. (2016). Does University Play Significant Role in Shaping Entrepreneurial Intention? A Cross-country Comparative Analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(3): 790-811. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2015-0149
Tsekea, S. & Chigwada, J. P. (2020). COVID-19: Strategies for Positioning the University Library in Support of E-learning. Digital Library Perspective. Retrieved October 16, 2020, from https://www.emerald.com/insight/2059-5816.htm
Tosunta?, ?. B., Karada?, E., & Orhan, S. (2015). The Factors Affecting Acceptance and Use of Interactive Whiteboard within the Scope of FATIH Project: A Structural Equation Model Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Computers & Education, 81: 167-178. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/computers-and-education
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1): 157-178. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002388
Yilmaz, B., Külcu, Ö., Ünal, Y., & Çakmak, T. (2013). Distance Education on Digitalization: Evaluation of An Application in Turkey. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 65(4): 336-357). http://doi.org/10.1108/AP-11-2011-0049
Zainuddin, Z., Parera, C. J., Haruna, H., & Habiburrahim, H. (2020). Literacy in the New Norm: Stay-home Game Plan for Parents. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8): 645-653. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0069
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Acceptance and Use Predictors of Open Data Technologies: Drawing upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Government Information Quarterly, 32: 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.005