ANALISIS PENERIMAAN MAHASISWA UPH TERHADAP UPH MOODLE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MENGGUNAKAN METODE TAM
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Utilization of an information technology, in this case the LMS at UPH, namely Moodle, can be done effectively if students as users have the competence to use it. Moodle has been used at UPH since before the Covid-19 pandemic and the pandemic became the catalyst for using Moodle. Meanwhile, it is known that no research has been conducted on UPH’s student acceptance of Moodle. Therefore, a study was conducted to analyze the factors influencing UPH’s student acceptance of UPH Moodle LMS using the TAM. TAM is a model of acceptance of information technology, which consists of 5 variables: perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), attitude to use (ATU), behavior to continue using (BIU), and real use (AU). To test hypotheses, a questionnaire was prepared and distributed to active students of the UPH Lippo Village regular undergraduate program batches of 2020, 2021, and 2022. The total number of respondents who filled in was 257 respondents and data was sorted so that the total data used was 178 respondents. Data processing uses SEM-PLS with SmartPLS software. The results of this study are 6 hypotheses accepted and 1 hypothesis rejected, which are PEOU has a positive and significant effect on PU and ATU, PU has a positive and significant effect on ATU and BIU, ATU has a positive and significant effect on BIU, BIU has a positive and significant effect on AU, PU does not has a positive and significant effect on AU.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All publications by Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Indsutri (Jurnal Keilmuan Teknik dan Manajemen Industri ) [p-ISSN: 2337-5841, e-ISSN: 2355-6528] is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Muhson, “Peningkatan Minat Belajar dan Pemahaman Mahasiswa melalui Penerapan Problem Based Learning,” Jurnal Kependidikan, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 171-182, 2009.
G. Cheng, and J. Chau, “Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course,” British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 257-278, 2016.
C. Sekundera PL., “Analisis Penerimaan Pengguna Akhir Dengan Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model dan End User Computing Satisfaction Terhadap Penerapan Sistem Core Banking Pada Bank ABC,” Master thesis Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2006.
D. Rustandi. “Menakar pendidikan pasca pandemi covid-19” [online], Mei 2020, available http://www.dikti.go.id/highlight/menakar-pendidikan-pasca-pandemi-covid19/?utm_source=.
R.K. Ellis, “Field Guide to Learning Management Systems,” ASTD Learning Circuits, 2009.
S. Raharja, L.D. Prasojo, dan A. Nugroho, “Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Learning Management System dengan Pengembangan Software Moodle di SMA Negeri Kota Yogyakarta,” Jurnal Kependidikan, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 55-70, 2011.
Jogiyanto, Sistem Teknologi Keperilakuan, Yogyakarta: Andi, 2007.
F. Davis, R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 982-1003, 1989.
F.S. Rahayu, D. Budiyanto, dan D. Palyama, “Analisis Penerimaan e-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Studi Kasus: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta),” JUTEI, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 85-95, 2017.
M.H. Musriannur, R. Yasirandi, and D. Oktaria, “Pengukuran dan Analisis Penerimaan LMS sebagai Media Belajar Online Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model di Universitas Telkom,” e-Proceeding of Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 11505-11509, 2021.
M. Mailizar, D. Burg and S. Maulina, “Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model,” Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 26, pp.7057–7077, 2021.
J. Iqbal, dan Arisman, “Metode Pembelajaran E-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Modelling (TAM) Untuk Pembelajaran Akuntansi,” Jurnal InFestasi, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 116-125, 2018.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
N. Kock, and P. Hadaya, “Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods,” Info Systems J, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 227-261, 2016.
I. Mahendra, “Penggunaan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dalam Mengevaluasi Penerimaan Pengguna Terhadap Sistem Informasi pada PT. ARI Jakarta,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi STMIK Antar Bangsa, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 183-195, 2016.
J.F. Hair, G. T. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Second Edition, Sage Publication, 2017.
M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J.F. Hair, "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," 2017.
J.F. Hair, J.J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM.” European Business Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 2-24, 2018.
M.A. Memon, H. Ting, J. Cheah, R. Thurasamy, F. Chuah, and T.- H. Cham, “Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations,” Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 4(2), pp.i-xx, 2020.
N. Fathema, D. Shanon, and M. Ross, “Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in Higher Education Institutions,” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 210-232, 2015.
J.T. Nagy, “Evaluation of Online Video Usage and Learning Satisfaction: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 160-185, 2018.