THE IMPACT OF CREATIVE SELF-EFFICACY IN EDUCATION: SCOPING REVIEW

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: May 3, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/ijassh.v2i3.33948
Keywords:
creative self-efficacy, education, creativity, self-efficacy, scoping review
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 8
Download : 4
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

Cecilia Ang
Undergraduate of Psychology, Universitas Tarumanagara
Renata Verla Gunjaya
Undergraduate of Psychology, Universitas Tarumanagara
P. Tommy Y.S. Suyasa
Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Tarumanagara

Abstract

The advancement of technology since the Covid-19 pandemic has significantly impacted education, increasing the need for creativity in society. One notable concept that has emerged over the past two decades is creative self-efficacy, which refers to an individual’s belief in their ability to generate creative ideas (Tierney & Farmer, 2002). This study employs a scoping review methodology to summarize the effects of creative self-efficacy in education. Specific criteria, as outlined in Table 1, were applied throughout the review process. From an initial selection of 273 articles, stages of identification, screening, and eligibility were conducted, resulting in 8 articles being included for further analysis. These 8 articles demonstrated variability in data collection methods, including mixed methods (n = 1), quantitative (n = 5), and literature reviews (n = 2). The analysis revealed six key impacts: (a) creativity, (b) creative performance, (c) team performance, (d) creative ideation, (e) divergent thinking skills, and (f) creative production. This study hopes to encourage the development of innovative learning methods in education, such as hybrid learning that integrates e-learning and other modern approaches.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): August 2024
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). The amusement park theoretical model of creativity. In The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 33–51). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316338470.004

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Byrge, C., & Tang, C. (2015). Embodied creativity training: Effects on creative self-efficacy and creative production. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.03.002

Castro, D. R., Anseel, F., Kluger, A. N., Lloyd, K. J., & Turjemanlevi, Y. (2018). Mere listening effect on creativity and the mediating role of psychological safety. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000177

Cropley, A. (2020). Creativity-focused technology education in the age of industry 4.0. Creativity, 1-10. [Note: Please provide full publication details for this reference, as it seems incomplete.]

Du, K., Wang, Y., Ma, X., Luo, Z., Wang, L., & Shi, B. (2020). Achievement goals and creativity: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Educational Psychology Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1751546

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity.

Gralewski, J., & Jankowska, D. M. (2020). Do parenting styles matter? Perceived dimensions of parenting styles, creative abilities and creative self-beliefs in adolescents. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100709

Hardy, J. H., Ness, A. M., & Mecca, J. (2017). Outside the box: Epistemic curiosity as a predictor of creative problem solving and creative performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.024

Harususilo, Y. E. (2018, December 11). Wah, siswa Indonesia pemakai teknologi tertinggi dunia! Ini 7 faktanya. Kompas.com. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2018/12/11/08143651/wah-siswa-indonesia-pemakai-teknologi-tertinggi-dunia-ini-7-faktanya?page=all

Huang, N. T., Chang, Y. S., & Chou, C. H. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100695

Kassim, H., Nicholas, H., & Ng, W. (2014). Using a multimedia learning tool to improve creative performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.03.004

Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice teachers’ personality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children’s creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.870424

Liu, G., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Lee, C., Wang, Y., & Brownell, M. (2013). Autonomous motivation and Chinese adolescents’ creative thinking: The moderating role of parental involvement. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843401

Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In Emotions in education (pp. 13–36). Academic Press.

Park, N. K., Jang, W., Thomas, E. L., & Smith, J. (2021). How to organize creative and innovative teams: Creative self-efficacy and innovative team performance. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1842010

Rizaty, M. A. (2023, February 3). Pengguna internet di Indonesia sentuh 212 juta pada 2023. DataIndonesia.id. https://dataindonesia.id/internet/detail/pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-sentuh-212-juta-pada-2023

Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6

Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663

Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.02.001

Steffens, K. R. (2022). Examining relationships among creativity skills training, domain-specific creativity, and creative self-efficacy: A mixed method study. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/2116

Tep, P., Maneewan, S., Chuathong, S., & Easter, M. A. (2021). The relationship between human values and creative ideation among undergraduate students: The role of creative self-efficacy. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), 1885575. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1885575

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429

Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCTDP). Swets and Zeitlinger.

Vally, Z., Shalloum, L., Alqedra, D., Shazly, S. E., Albloshi, M., Alsheraifi, S., & Alkaabi, A. (2019). Examining the effects of creativity training on creative production, creative self-efficacy, and neuro-executive functioning. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.003

Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity Assessment Packet (CAP): Manual. D.O.K. Publishers, Inc.

Zhang, H., Sun, C., Liu, X., Gong, S., Yu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Boys benefit more from teacher support: Effects of perceived teacher support on primary students’ creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100680