THE CAUSE OF INHIBITION POLICY FORMULATION OF TRADING IN INFLUENCE AS CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Trading in Influence acts are non-mandatory offenses regulated in UNCAC and ratified by Law Number 7 of 2006 concerning UNCAC Ratification. Based on the cases that have occurred in Indonesia, the act of Trading in Influence has actually developed in Indonesia, but is considered as “bribery”. Indonesia has not been able to ensnare the perpetrators of trading in influence under the Corruption Law because there are no rules that regulate it, so there is legal uncertainty and a legal vacuum. This is due to the many factors that hinder the formulation of trading in influence policies in Indonesia. The research method used is normative using library materials or document studies for library research. This study looks back at what are the causes so that it is immediately regulated in Indonesia to be able to distinguish between bribery and the act of trading in influence in the context of overcoming corruption in Indonesia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bachtiar, Metode Penelitian Hukum, UNPAM Press, Pamulang, 2019.
Bambang Sunggono, Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2008.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru, Kencana, Jakarta, 2008.
Dadang Siswanto, Korupsi Sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Transnasional Terorganisir, The Journal of Masalah-Masalah Hukum, vol. 42, 2013, pp. 123-130. DOI: https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/ article/view/5868/9903
Eddy O.S. Hiariej, United Nations Convention Against Corruption dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia, The Journal of Mimbar Hukum, vol. 3, 2019, pp. 112-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.43968
Fajar Nurhardianto, Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia, The Journal of TAPIs, vol. 11, 2015, pp. 37. DOI: http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/ TAPIs/article/view/840/723
H. John Kenedi, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.
Imentari Siin Sembiring, Urgensi Perumusan Perbuatan Memperdagangkan Pengaruh sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi, The Journal of Hukum, vol. 3, 2020, pp. 59-84. DOI: https://ujh.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/ article/view/105/36
Indonesia Corruption Watch, Kajian Implementasi Aturan Trading in Influence dalam Hukum Nasional, Indonesia Corruption Watch, Jakarta, 2014.
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme di Indonesia, UNDIP Publishing Agency, Semarang, 2005.
Priyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Zifatama Publishing, Surabaya, 2016.
Rahman Amin, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana dan Perdata, Deepulish, Sleman, 2020.
Soedarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1981.
Soejono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Indonesia University, Jakarta, 1984.
Surashimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Rieneka Cipta, 2002.
United Nations Convention Against Corruption, Article 18 letters (a) and (b), New York.
Yenti Garnasih, Paradigma Baru dalam Pengaturan Anti Korupsi di Indonesia dikaitkan dengan UNCAC 2003, The Journal of Hukum Prioris, vol. 2, 2021, pp. 161-174. DOI: https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/ prioris/article/view/334