ACCOMODATION COMMUNICATION BY CHANGING SOCIAL IDENTITY (CASE STUDY OF MIGRANTS FROM SOLO IN JAKARTA IN INTERACTING BY CHANGING DIALECT)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Jakarta, as a metropolitan city and economic center, attracts residents from outside the area to urbanize. Solo people in Jakarta do the same thing: find work, continue their education, etc. The existing differences in social identity include dialects that have the potential to cause conflicts, such as domination and group segmentation so that other cultures feel alienated. To minimize conflict, migrants feel the need to adapt. This study uses a qualitative approach through the case study method. The research data were sourced from interviews, observations, documentation, and literature studies. The theory used is intercultural communication, barriers to intercultural communication, communication accommodation, social identity, and dialect. The results showed that the adjustment process for Solo immigrants depended on the adaptability of each individual. Adjustments were made by associating with people with a Jakarta dialect. The purpose of adjusting the Solo migrants is so that both parties can understand communication, the presence of migrants is accepted to achieve their goals in Jakarta. Constraints experienced by informants during the interaction process are dialect differences, it is difficult to change the habits of the Solo dialect so some informants experience anxiety about negative prejudices from the environment.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
S. S. Azeharie and W. P. Sari, Masyarakat Multikultural dan Dinamika Budaya. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.
A. Izzak and D. L. Sukmawati, “Pemakaian Bahasa Indonesia Pada Rubrik ‘Kedai’, di Majalah ‘Qalam’ di Pondok Pesantren Al-Amien Prenduan Sumenep,” 2008.
A. M. Yusuf, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
C. A. Nuraflah, “HAMBATAN KOMUNIKASI ANTAR BUDAYA,” Politeknik MBP, vol. 6(2), p. 152, 2017.
D. P. Sari, “PENDUDUK DATANG DAN BERMUKIM DI DKI JAKARTA MARET 2020,” PORTAL STATISTIK SEKTORAL PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA, 2020.
F. Adelina, F. Hanurawan, and I. Y. Suhanti, “HUBUNGAN ANTARA PRASANGKA SOSIAL DAN INTENSI MELAKUKAN DISKRIMINASI MAHASISWA ETNIS JAWA TERHADAP MAHASISWA YANG BERASAL DARI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR,” Jurnal Sains Psikologi, 2017.
I. Dianto, “HAMBATAN KOMUNIKASI ANTAR BUDAYA (Menarik Diri, Prasangka Sosial dan Etnosentrisme),” Fakultas Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi IAIN Padangsidimpuan, vol. 13, p. 211, 2019.
J. C. Timothius, “Adaptasi Antarbudaya Mahasiswa Perantauan di Kota Salatiga (Etnis Bali, Minahasa, Dayak, Papua, dan Batak dengan Kebudayaan Jawa),” Universitas Diponegoro, 2015.
J. W. Creswell, Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2019.
L. H. Turner and R. West, Pengantar Teori Komunikasi, 5th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2017.
L. J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.
M. Nazir, Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Bogor Ghalia Indonesia, 2013.
N. O. P. Sari and T. Rahardjo, “Akomodasi Komunikasi Antarbudaya (Etnis Jawa Dengan Etnis Minang),” Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 2019.
Ridwan, “Problematika Keragaman Kebudayaan Dan Alternatif Pemecahan (Perspektif Sosiologi),” Jurnal Madaniyah, vol. 2, 2015.
S. Daulay, “Penggusuran Dialek Medan oleh Dialek Jakarta,” FBS UNIMED, 2012.
S. Siyoto and A. Sodik, Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing, 2015.
S. W. Littlejohn and K. A. Foss, Teori Komunikasi, 9th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2014.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2017.
W. Triatmojo, “Persepsi Mahasiswa Surakarta Terhadap Dialek Jawa Surabaya (Deskriptif Kualitatif Komunikasi Pada Mahasiswa Surakarta Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Komunikasi dan Informatika Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta),” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2017.
Wensi and S. S. Azeharie, “Interaksi Sosial antara Kelompok Masyarakat Dayak dan Kelompok Masyarakat Tionghoa di Singkawang,” vol. 4(1), pp. 66–75, 2020.