EXPLORING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN AND CONSUMER’S MOTIVES TOWARDS INTENTION TO PURCHASE ELECTRIC VEHICLE IN JAKARTA
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 10
Download : 9
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years, environmental damage has become a global problem. The cause of environmental damage is air pollution caused by various vehicle fuels, which produce CO2. This encourages people to care more about the environment, including the automotive industry. The rise of the environmental movement is encouraging car companies to produce electric vehicle products to reduce pollution. This research was conducted to determine and test the effects of environmental concerns, gain motives, and normative motives towards intention to purchase electric vehicle in Jakarta, and to test hedonic motivation as a mediator of gain motives and normative motives towards purchase intention. The study included 325 people living in Jakarta who either own or plan to own an electric car. This research use non-probability sampling techniques with the judgmental sampling method for sampling. The results of testing in this research used the PLS-SEM model with Smart-PLS system software version 4.0. The research results show that gain motives and normative motives have significant impact towards hedonic motives. Normative motives and hedonic motives have significant effects towards purchase intention. Environmental concern and gain motives have no significant impact towards purchase intention. Gain motives and normative motives influence purchase intention through hedonic motives.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
IJAEB by Graduate Program of Universitas Tarumanagara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/ijaeb
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Al Mamun, A., Nawi, N. C., Hayat, N., & Zainol, N. R. B. (2020). Predicting the purchase intention and behaviour towards green skincare products among Malaysian consumers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410663
Byerly, H., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P. J., Hopkins, J., Business, C., Courtney, S., Wagner, H., & Palchak, E. (2018). Nudging pro-environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(3), 159–168. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/rsfac/43
Chahal, H., Dangwal, R., & Raina, S. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of strategic green marketing orientation. Journal of Global Responsibility, 5(2), 338–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-09-2013-0012
Chakraborty, A., Singh, M. P., & Roy, M. (2017). A study of goal frames shaping pro-environmental behaviour in university students. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(7), 1291–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2016-0185
Chan, R. Y. K. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 18(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1013
Chaturvedi, P., Kulshreshtha, K., & Tripathi, V. (2021). Investigating the role of celebrity institutional entrepreneur in reducing the attitude-behavior gap in sustainable consumption. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(3), 625–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2021-0226
Chaturvedi, P., Kulshreshtha, K., Tripathi, V., & Agnihotri, D. (2022). Exploring consumers’ motives for electric vehicle adoption: bridging the attitude–behavior gap. Benchmarking. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2021-0618
Choy, D., & Prizzia, R. (2010). Consumer behaviour and environmental quality in Hawaii. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831011036858
Dijkstra, J. K., Kretschmer, T., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Hedonic, instrumental, and normative motives: differentiating patterns for popular, accepted, and rejected adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614535092
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of Environmental Sociology, 3(6), 482–524. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285810112
Fatoki, O. (2022). Determinants of household energy saving behaviour: An application of the goal framing theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(5), 1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170527
Fitri, R. A., & Wulandari, R. (2020). Online purchase intention factors in Indonesian millenial. International Review of Management and Marketing, 10(3), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.9852
Fraj, E., & Martinez, E. (2007). Ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00565.x
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A PRIMER ON PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING (PLS-SEM) (Third Edition). Sage.
Hameed, I., & Khan, K. (2020). An extension of the goal-framing theory to predict consumer’s sustainable behavior for home appliances. Energy Efficiency, 13(7), 1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09890-4
Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Gärling, T. (2008). The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004
Hanss, D., Böhm, G., Doran, R., & Homburg, A. (2016). Sustainable consumption of groceries: the importance of believing that one can contribute to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 24(6), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1615
Huang, Y., Liao, C., Zhang, J., Guo, H., Zhou, N., & Zhao, D. (2019). Exploring potential pathways toward urban greenhouse gas peaks: a case study of Guangzhou, China. Applied Energy, 251.
Kendaraan Bermotor Biang Kerok Polusi Jakarta, Salah Siapa? (2023, August 15). CNBC Indonesia.
Khan, K., Hameed, I., Akram, U., & Hussainy, S. K. (2023). Do normative triggers and motivations influence the intention to purchase organic food? An application of the goal-framing theory. British Food Journal, 125(3), 886–906. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2021-1194
Klabi, F., & Binzafrah, F. (2023). Exploring the relationships between Islam, some personal values, environmental concern, and electric vehicle purchase intention: the case of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(2), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2020-0170
Kopetz, C. E., Kruglanski, A. W., Arens, Z. G., Etkin, J., & Johnson, H. M. (2012). The dynamics of consumer behavior: A goal systemic perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.03.001
Lee, K. (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 26(6), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810902839
Lieven, T., Mühlmeier, S., Henkel, S., & Waller, J. F. (2011). Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.001
Lindenberg, S., & Papies, E. K. (2019). Two kinds of nudging and the power of cues: Shifting salience of alternatives and shifting salience of goals. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 13(3–4), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000110
Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137.
Liobikienė, G., & Minelgaitė, A. (2021). Energy and resource-saving behaviours in European Union countries: The Campbell paradigm and goal framing theory approaches. Science of The Total Environment, 750.
Minton, A. P., & Rose, R. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 37–48.
Mustikawati, E., Utama, L., Ruslim, S. T., & Wijaya, H. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat beli makanan organik. Jurnal Bina Manajemen, 9(2), 146–161.
Nanaki, E. A., Koroneos, C. J., Roset, J., Susca, T., Christensen, T. H., De, S., Hurtado, G., Rybka, A., Kopitovic, J., Heidrich, O., & Amparo López-Jiménez, P. (2017). Environmental assessment of 9 European public bus transportation systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28, 42–52.
Park, J., Ko, E., & Kim, S. (2010). Consumer behavior in green marketing for luxury brand: A cross-cultural study of US, Japan and Korea. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 20(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/12297119.2010.9707436
Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bengtsson, M. (2018). Consumer motivations for sustainable consumption: The interaction of gain, normative and hedonic motivations on electric vehicle adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074
Ruslim, T. S., Kartika, Y., & Hapsari, C. G. (2022). Effect of environmental concern, attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and availability on purchase of green skincare products with intention to purchase as a mediation variable. Journal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 8(1), 120–137.
Ruslim, T. S., Setiawan, K., Hapsari, C. G., & Herwindiati, D. E. (2023). Factors that increase purchase intention of electric cars in Jakarta. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business (IJAEB), 1(3), 2987–1972. https://doi.org/10.24912/ijaeb.v1.i3.968-977
Sabri, M. F. M., Danapalasingam, K. A., & Rahmat, M. F. (2016). A review on hybrid electric vehicles architecture and energy management strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1433–1442.
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
Setiadi, F. J., & Ruslim, T. S. (2020). Pengaruh citra merek terhadap niat beli konsumen (studi pada Toyota Agya). Jurnal Manajerial Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(3), 603–611.
Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: the role of values, situational factors and goals. In Journal of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 104–115). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
Steg, L., Lindenberg, S., & Keizer, K. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, norms and environmental behaviour: The dynamics of overarching goals. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000077
Stern, P. C., Young, O. R., & Druckman, D. (1992). Global Environmental Change: Understanding the Human Dimensions. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/1792
Sumber Polusi Udara Jakarta, Kendaraan atau Bukan yang Paling Berdosa? (2023, September 6). CNN Indonesia.
Tu, J. C., & Yang, C. (2019). Key factors influencing consumers’ purchase of electric vehicles. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(14), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143863
Xing, J., Leard, B., & Li, S. (2021). What does an electric vehicle replace? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 107. http://www.nber.org/papers/w25771
Yohanna, & Ruslim, T. S. (2021). Pengaruh brand love, brand satisfaction, brand trust terhadap purchase intention produk Gucci. Jurnal Manajerial Dan Kewirausahaan, 3(2), 569–579.
Zameer, H., & Yasmeen, H. (2022). Green innovation and environmental awareness driven green purchase intentions. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 40(5), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-12-2021-0457