THE CASE STUDY OF INDONESIA’S EMISSION TRADING SYSTEM AND LESSONS LEARNED FOR VIETNAM

Main Article Content

Nguyen Thi Thanh Huyen
Nguyen Minh Chau
Do Thu Thao
Dang Chau Anh

Abstract

Climate change has increasingly become a concerning threat in the past few decades. Aware of this reality, developing nations are actively engaged to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. One of these engagements is the implementation of emmission trading system. This article aims to compare the effectiveness of Indonesia's and Vietnam’s expected emmission trading system to propose policy implications for Vietnamese governments. By using the desk study through analyzing and synthesizing documents, the authors conduct the assessment of these two emmission trading systems against five criteria: environmental effectiveness, economic efficiency, market management, revenue management, and stakeholder engagement. The recent implementation of emmission trading system in Indonesia demonstrates that most criteria are evaluated at low and medium levels and some of them do not have already available data for research. Similarly, Vietnam’s expected emmission trading system has little information to analyze. From the research results, the paper proposes several market management features that can be applied in the context of Vietnam.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

An, K. (2023). 1.912 doanh nghiệp bắt buộc phải kiểm kê khí nhà kính và đáp ứng hạn ngạch phát thải. Scp.gov.vn. http://scp.gov.vn/tin-tuc/t13413/1-912-doanh-nghiep-bat-buoc-phai-kiem-ke-khi-nha-kinh-va-dap-ung-han-ngach-phat-thai.html#:~:text=Theo%20%C4%91%C3%B3%2C%20c%E1%BA%A3%20n%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Bc%20c%C3%B3

Ashurst. (2023). Indonesia carbon pricing and trading regime for power generation. Ashurst. https://www.ashurst.com/en/insights/indonesia-carbon-pricing-and-trading-regime-for-power-generation/

Asia Society. (n.d.). ETS Status: Indonesia. Asiasociety.org. Retrieved March 3, 2024, from https://www.google.com/url?q=https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/ets-status-indonesia&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1709460946456819&usg=AOvVaw1BOE5jE8bixopd9SPETIOj

Báo Công Thương. (2023). Kinh nghiệm xây dựng thị trường carbon trên thế giới | Báo Công Thương. Báo Công Thương Điện Tử, Kinh Tế, Chính Trị, Xã Hội. https://congthuong.vn/nhung-quoc-gia-dang-xuc-tien-xay-dung-thi-truong-carbon-278100.html

Data Monthly . (2023). IDX Carbon. https://idxcarbon.co.id/data-monthly

Dissanayake, S., Mahadevan, R., & Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2020). Evaluating the efficiency of carbon emissions policies in a large emitting developing country. Energy Policy, 136, 111080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111080

EU-ETS carbon pricing 2022. (2024). Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1322214/carbon-prices-european-union-emission-trading-scheme/

Florentina, D. (2023, October 20). Indonesia Carbon Exchange Explained: Trading Carbon Like a Stock | Carbonethics. Carbonethics. https://www.carbonethics.co/post/indonesia-carbon-exchange-explained-what-you-need-to-know-about-it

Gayer, T., & Horowitz, J. K. (2005). Market-based Approaches to Environmental Regulation. Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics, 1(4), 201–326. https://doi.org/10.1561/0700000013

Hoai, T. (2024, January 2). Thúc đẩy giảm phát thải khí nhà kính, phát triển thị trường các-bon tại Việt Nam. Monre.gov.vn. https://monre.gov.vn/Pages/thuc-day-giam-phat-thai-khi-nha-kinh,-phat-trien-thi-truong-cac-bon-tai-viet-nam.aspx?cm=Bi%E1%BA%BFn%20%C4%91%E1%BB%95i%20kh%C3%AD%20h%E1%BA%ADu

Howie, P., Gupta, S., Park, H., & Akmetov, D. (2020). Evaluating policy success of emissions trading schemes in emerging economies: comparing the experiences of Korea and Kazakhstan. Climate Policy, 20(5), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1751030

Huggel, C., Bouwer, L. M., Juhola, S., Mechler, R., Muccione, V., Orlove, B., & Wallimann-Helmer, I. (2022). The existential risk space of climate change. Climatic Change, 174(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03430-y

Huong, T. (2024a). Bài 1: Đảm bảo thị trường các–bon vận hành thí điểm vào năm 2025 | Báo Công Thương. Báo Công Thương Điện Tử, Kinh Tế, Chính Trị, Xã Hội. https://congthuong.vn/bai-1-dam-bao-thi-truong-cac-bon-van-hanh-thi-diem-vao-nam-2025-307412.html

Huong, T. (2024b, February 29). Hơn 100 doanh nghiệp tham gia tập huấn thị trường các-bon và ETS | Báo Công Thương. Báo Công Thương Điện Tử, Kinh Tế, Chính Trị, Xã Hội. https://congthuong.vn/hon-100-doanh-nghiep-tham-gia-tap-huan-thi-truong-carbon-va-ets-305953.html

ICAP. (2020). International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). Icapcarbonaction.com. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/?

ICAP. (2023). Indonesia launches emissions trading system for power generation sector. Icapcarbonaction.com. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/news/indonesia-launches-emissions-trading-system-power-generation-sector

ICAP x PMR. (2020). EMISSIONS TRADING IN PRACTICE: A Handbook on Design and Implementation. https://icapcarbonaction.com/system/files/document/ets-handbook-2020_finalweb.pdf

Indonesia Third National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Feb 15]. Available from: https://pse.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/1405/Pajak-Emisi-GRK-dan-Marginal-Abatement-Cost-Research-Brief-Juni-2021.pdf

Jiang, J., Ye, B., & Liu, J. (2019). Research on the peak of CO2 emissions in the developing world: Current progress and future prospect. Applied Energy, 235, 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.089

Jiang, J., Zhang, Q., & Hui, Y. (2023). The Impact of Market and Non-Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments on Firms’ Sustainable Technological Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Firms. Sustainability, 15(5), 4425. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054425

Jung, H., & Song, C.-K. (2023). Effects of emission trading scheme (ETS) on change rate of carbon emission. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28154-6

Kumar, A., Nagar, S., & Anand, S. (2021). Climate change and existential threats. Global Climate Change, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822928-6.00005-8

Laing, T., Sato, M., Grubb, M., & Comberti, C. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System. https://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/WP106-effectiveness-eu-emissions-trading-system.pdf

Lien, M. K., Huyen, N. D., Cong, N. T., & Minh, N. V. (2020) Exploring Potential Participation of Vietnam in the Carbon Market. Low Carbon Economy, 11, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2020.112002

Li, W., An, C., & Lu, C. (2018). The assessment framework of provincial carbon emission driving factors: An empirical analysis of Hebei Province. Science of the Total Environment, 637-638, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.419

Liu, Y., & Wei, T. (2014). Linking the emissions trading schemes of Europe and China - Combining climate and energy policy instruments. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9580-5

MRV system for mitigation actions in Indonesia. (n.d.). Www.international-Climate-Initiative.com. Retrieved February 24, 2024, from https://www.international-climate-initiative.com/en/project/mrv-system-for-mitigation-actions-in-indonesia-18-i-307-idn-g-mrv-for-ndc-implementation/

Narassimhan, Easwaran; Gallagher, Kelly S.; Koester, Stefan; Alejo, Julio Rivera (2018). Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems. Climate Policy, (), 1–25. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827

Narassimhan, E., Gallagher, K. S., Koester, S., & Alejo, J. R. (2018). Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems. Climate Policy, 18(8), 967–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827

OECD. (n.d.). Emission trading systems - OECD. Www.oecd.org. Retrieved April 2, 2024, from https://www.oecd.org/environment/tools-evaluation/emissiontradingsystems.htm

Ordonez, J. A., Fritz, M., & Eckstein, J. (2022). Coal vs. renewables: Least-cost optimization of the Indonesian power sector. Energy for Sustainable Development, 68, 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.04.017

Parry, I. W. H., Black, S., & Zhunussova, K. (2022). Carbon Taxes or Emissions Trading Systems?: Instrument Choice and Design. Staff Climate Notes, 2022(006). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400212307.066.A001

PMR & ICAP. (2016). Emissions trading in practice: A handbook on design and implementation. Washington, DC: Partnership on Market Readiness (PMR), International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP), and World Bank.

Reccessary. (n.d.). Indonesia launches first carbon exchange, traded at price of $4.51 per unit | NEWS. Reccessary. Retrieved March 9, 2024, from https://www.reccessary.com/en/news/id-finance/indonesia-launches-carbon-exchange-traded-at-price-4-51-per-unit

Saeed, S., Makhdum, M. S. A., Anwar, S., & Yaseen, M. R. (2023). Climate Change Vulnerability, Adaptation, and Feedback Hypothesis: A Comparison of Lower-Middle, Upper-Middle, and High-Income Countries. Sustainability, 15(5), 4145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054145

SDCourses. (n.d.). Eco-effectiveness. Sustainable Development Courses. https://sdcourses.org/glossary/eco-effectiveness/

Shi, Y., Paramati, R., & Ren, X. (2019). ADBI Working Paper Series THE GROWTH OF CARBON MARKETS IN ASIA: THE POTENTIAL CHALLENGES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Asian Development Bank Institute. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/519041/adbi-wp987.pdf

STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGEMENT PLAN Partnership for Market Implementation Republic of Indonesia. (2023). https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099080223235070662/pdf/P17777300bfbf90110a572062222fb19b91.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1QOyo_F_D2dZSRf5vTf86xvav2hEdPBNqoyHjvePNzD5hWll0g6RG0FUk_aem_ATaMB4Ke_WW6Nca0lSFhA17IJf6XrmjAqPTSlk_Ul86FbVFIjkkSAaiUiixtsDaqwsVvRDid1O7TtXhYRq4DgW7-

Stoerk, T., Dudek, D. J., & Yang, J. (2019). China’s national carbon emissions trading scheme: lessons from the pilot emission trading schemes, academic literature, and known policy details. Climate Policy, 19(4), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1568959

Talluri, K. T., & Van Ryzin, G. J. (2004). Introduction. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-27391-4_1

Tang, L., Wang, H., Li, L., Yang, K., & Mi, Z. (2020). Quantitative models in emission trading system research: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 132, 110052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110052

The Asia Foundation . (2023). THE STATE OF CARBON PRICING IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Malaysia_The-State-of-Carbon-Pricing-in-Southeast-Asia.pdf

Truong, B. (2023, March 30). Progress Report: Vietnam’s Carbon Market, March 2023. Vietnam Briefing News. https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/vietnams-carbon-market-2023.html/

Venmans, F. (2012). A literature-based multi-criteria evaluation of the EU ETS. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 5493–5510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.036

VNECC. (2023, November 16). Khảo sát nhận thức, sự sẵn sàng và nhu cầu đào tạo năng lực của các doanh nghiệp tham gia Hệ thống Giao dịch Hạn ngạch Phát thải (ETS) tại Việt Nam. EEC. https://eec.vn/khao-sat-nhan-thuc-su-san-sang-va-nhu-cau-dao-tao-nang-luc-cua-cac-doanh-nghiep-tham-gia-he-thong-giao-dich-han-ngach-phat-thai-ets-tai-viet-nam/

World Bank. (2023). State and trends of carbon pricing 2023. Worldbank.org. https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/sites/ppp.worldbank.org/files/2023-10/State%20and%20Trends%20of%20Carbon%20Pricing%202023.pdf

WorldBank. (2023). CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) - Indonesia | Data. Worldbank.org. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?locations=ID

Zhang, Y., Li, S., Luo, T., & Gao, J. (2020). The effect of emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence from an integrated study of pilot regions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121843, 121843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121843

Zhao, X., Jiang, G., Nie, D., & Chen, H. (2016). How to improve the market efficiency of carbon trading: A perspective of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.052