SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: EXPLORATION OF FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY PERFORMANCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research literature review that reviews the literature on the factors that influence innovation variables has been a lot, but those that review innovation performance variables are relatively still not much. Therefore, the literature review in this study aims to investigate the factors that affect innovation performance in manufacturing companies, as well as factors that act as mediation and moderation. The Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method is used in this study to analyze and review or look back at findings that are systematically identified based on previous research evidence related to factors that affect the innovation performance of manufacturing companies. Research data was obtained from Google Scholar with a time span of 2015-2023. Findings on journal searches found 304 articles. Based on the search for articles that discuss and focus on factors that affect the specific innovation performance of manufacturing companies, 25 articles were found. The article is used as a data source and will be examined in more depth. The results of the research found that (1) Various factors affect innovation performance in manufacturing companies; (2) Several factors can mediate and moderate exogenous (independent) variables on the innovation performance of manufacturing companies; and (3) Various theories have been used in research on the innovation performance of manufacturing companies. Therefore, manufacturing companies can use the above variables as factors that can be used to improve innovation performance to increase productivity, effectiveness, and can drive growth for manufacturing companies. These findings can be used as reference material for further research on variables that are able to mediate and moderate the relationship between exogenous variables on innovation performance in manufacturing companies and the theory used.
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
IJAEB by Graduate Program of Universitas Tarumanagara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/ijaeb
References
Adegbite, W. M., & Govender, C. M. (2022). Management barriers to innovation performance in Nigerian manufacturing sector. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14(7), 1959-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1991553
Cabrilo, S., Kianto, A., & Milic, B. (2018). The effect of IC components on innovation performance in Serbian companies. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(3), 448-466. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2016-0033
Capability, P. I., Integration, I. T., & Performance, I. (2022). Hanifah F. 1(1), 18- 41.
ÇETIN, O. (2022). Effect of Continuous Improvement and Quality Data and Reporting on Innovation Performance. Prizren Social Science Journal, 6(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v6i1.290
Chang, C. H. (2020). Green open innovation activities and green co-innovation performance in taiwan's manufacturing sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186677
Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2020). Factors affecting innovation performance of manufacturing firms: Case evidences. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 11(3), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.2020070106
Elier, I., Kusumawardhany, P. A., & Setyawan, A. B. (2022). the Effect of Knowledge Sharing, Absorptive Capacity, and Individual Creativity on Innovation Performance in East Java Indonesia Manufacturing Companies. Business and Finance Journal, 7(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.33086/bfj.v7i2.3482
Gachanja, I. M., Nganga, S. I., & Kiganane, L. M. (2020). The Moderating effect of Innovation Ecosystem on Knowledge Entrepreneurship and Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Kenya. IJEBD (International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development), 3(3), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v3i3.987
Hartono, A., & Kusumawardhani, R. (2018). Searching Widely or Deeply? the Impact of Open Innovation on Innovation and Innovation Performance Among Indonesian Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 33(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.29218
Hung, B. Q., Anh, T. T., & Thong, N. N. (2020). Innovation: From Capabilities To Performance In Manufacturing Enterprises In Vietnam. Journal of Economic Development, 45(1), 61-81.
Indonesia, U. I. (2021). the Role of R&D and Open Innovation Activities on Innovation Performance; a Case of Indonesia. 1(1), 104-126.
Kashif Akbar. (2021). How economic sustainability is affected by innovation performance and sustainable manufacturing. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 11(1), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2021.11.1.0350
Kolluru, S., & Mukhopadhaya, P. (2017). Empirical Studies on Innovation Performance in the Manufacturing and Service Sectors Since 1995: A Systematic Review. Economic Papers, 36(2), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12167
Latifah, L., & Ritonga, I. (2020). Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Competence of Human Resources for the Development of Islamic Banking in Indonesia. Al Maal: Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking, 2(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.31000/ALMAAL.V2I1.2763
Long, C. S., Abdul Aziz, M. H., Kowang, T. O., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2015). Impact of TQM practices on innovation performance among manufacturing companies in Malaysia. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.7166/26-1-1038
Marchi, V. De. (2018). ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND RELATIONSHIP LEARNING MECHANISMS. 1-33.
Mennens, K., Van Gils, A., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Letterie, W. (2018). Exploring antecedents of service innovation performance in manufacturing SMEs. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 36(5), 500-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242617749687
Mubarak, M. F., Tiwari, S., Petraite, M., Mubarik, M., & Raja Mohd Rasi, R. Z. (2021). How Industry 4.0 technologies and open innovation can improve green innovation performance? Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(5), 1007-1022. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0266
Naidoo, S., & Govender, V. (2023). A Fourth Industrial Revolution approach to total quality management on innovation performance: evidence from South Africa. International Journal of Business Excellence, 29(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2020.10032315
Ogunkoya, O. A. (2019). Value Creation and Innovation Performance of Nigeria Manufacturing Firm. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Business Strategies and Management, 7(1), 1-17.
Olubunmi, O. E., & Orajekwe, J. (2021). Effect of Environmental Management Practices on Technological Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria. Effect Of Environmental Management Practices On Technological Innovation Performance Of Manufacturing Companies In Nigeria, 1(1), 1-11.
Otchere, S. K., Nyamewaa, E. B., & Hammond, F. (2022). Big Data Characteristics and Innovation Performance in Ghanaian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of the Big Data Team? OALib, 09(02), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108378
Rinoop, V., Anil, A. P., & Satish, K. P. (2017). Effect of TQM Practices on Quality Performance Through Operating Performance - An Empirical Study. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 4(7), 2937-2943. https://irjet.net/archives/V4/i7/IRJET-V4I7593.pdf
Safari, A., & Azadehdel, M. R. (2015). The Key Role of Knowledge-Oriented Leadership in Innovation Performance of Manufacturing and Commercial Companies of Guilan Province. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 62(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.62.1
Shababi, H., Farahani, M. G., Ashtiani, P. G., & Azandehi, A. H. (2022). Conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0 license) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ The Impact of Open Innovation on Innovative Performance of Mazandaran Province Industry, Mining and Trad. 19, 507-526. https://karafan.tvu.ac.ir/?lang=en
Why Innovation is Crucial to Manufacturing - Yamato Scale. (n.d.). Retrieved April 16, 2024, from https://www-yamatoscale-co-uk.translate.goog/why- innovation-is-crucial-to- manufacturing/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc
Yanginlar, G., Civelek, M. E., & Gülçür, E. (2023). The Effect of Supply Chain Risk Management on Logistics Performance and Innovation Performance. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(11), e03164. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i11.3164
Yusr, M. M. (2016). Innovation capability and its role in enhancing the relationship between TQM practices and innovation performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-016-0031-2