"WHEN REWARDS NO LONGER MOTIVATE" TESTING THE MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY IN BUILDING INNOVATIVE LECTURERS IN THE ERA OF INDONESIA INDEPENDENT CAMPUS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Innovative work behavior is the key to the performance and existence of an organization. In the context of business organizations, organizational factors that are antecedents of innovative work behavior are far from stable. Therefore, it is still necessary to conduct further research with different organizations and respondents. This study will examine organizational factors in Indonesian universities, which consist of: 1) organizational climate for innovation, 2) reward, 3) organizational agility as moderating variables. By using purposive random sampling involving 265 lecturers from universities in the Jakarta area, Indonesia, the results indicate that only the organizational climate for innovation variable has a significant positive effect directly on the innovative work behavior of lecturers. Meanwhile, the reward variable only has a partial significant positive effect after being moderated by the organizational agility variable. This phenomenon is a novelty in this study that rewards, which are believed to be able to change behavior as mentioned in social exchange theory so far, have experienced a shift in perceptions from lecturer respondents, where rewards are no longer motivating without including agility factors in their management. Organizational agility is a new term that is gaining popularity in strategic management which is defined as an agility that reflects flexibility, speed, accuracy, efficiency and innovation. This study has theoretical contributions and practical implications for higher education management and provides discussion and recommendations for future research.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
IJAEB by Graduate Program of Universitas Tarumanagara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/ijaeb
References
Adeel Ahmed, Sabeen Hussain Bhatti, Ismail Gölgeci, Ahmad Arslan, Digital platform capability and organizational agility of emerging market manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of intellectual capital and the moderating role of environmental dynamism, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 177, 2022, 121513, ISSN 0040-1625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121513. (https://www.science direct.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522000452)
Anderson, N., Potoˇcnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.
Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 569–586.
Bysted, R., & Hansen, J. R. (2015). Comparing Public and Private Sector Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types, and subsectors. Public Management Review, 17(5), 698–717.
Chiara Franco, Fabio Landini, Organizational drivers of innovation: The role of workforce agility, Research Policy, Volume 51, Issue 2, 2022, 104423, ISSN 0048-7333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104423. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S004873332100216X)
Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., Soto-Acosta, P., Wensley, A.K., 2016. Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility. J. Bus. Res. 69 (5), 1544–1549.
Ciro Troise, Vincenzo Corvello, Abby Ghobadian, Nicholas O'Regan. How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: The role of agility in the digital transformation era, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 174, 2022, 121227, ISSN 0040-1625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121227. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521006600)
Cook, Karen & Cheshire, Coye & Rice, Eric & Nakagawa, Sandra. (2013). Social Exchange Theory. Book Chapter (3). 10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_3. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/290110057_Social_Exchange_Theory
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.
Doz, Y.L., 2020. Fostering strategic agility: How individual executives and human resource practices contribute. Human Resource Management Review. 30 (1), 100693.
Ghozali, Imam. (2015). Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris (2nd ed.). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Hanseler, Jorg. Ringle, Christian M., & Sarstedt, Marko. (2015). A New Criterion for Assesing Discriminat Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. Retrieved October 7, 2021.
Haider, S.A., Martins, J.M., Khan, S., Mata, M.N., Tehseen, S., Abreu, A., 2021. A literature review on agility-is there a need to develop a new instrument? International Journal of Entrepreneurship. 25 (4), 1–14.
Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609–1621. ISSN 0148-2963, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0148296313003342)
Hair Jr., J.F., Hult, G.T.M., C.M., Ringle & Sarstedt, Marko. (2015). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage: United States of America.
Hair Jr., J.F., Hult, G.T.M., C.M., Ringle & Sarstedt, Marko, Danks, N.P., Ray, Soumya. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer: United States of America. ISSN 2662-2866 ISSN 2662-2874 (electronic) Classroom Companion: Business ISBN 978-3-030-80518-0 ISBN 978-3-030-80519-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hair Jr., & Risher, Jeff & Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
Holbeche, L., 2018. The Agile organization: How to Build an engaged, Innovative and Resilient Business. Kogan Page Publishers.
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549–569.
Kang, J. H., Matusik, J. G., Kim, T.-Y., & Phillips, J. M. (2016). Interactive effects of multiple organizational climates on employee innovative behavior in entrepreneurial firms: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31 (6), 628–642.
L.T. Hu, P.M. Bentler. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis–Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1) (1999), pp. 1-55
Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142–150.
Ravichandran, T., 2018. Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 27 (1), 22–42.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.
Sanders, K., Moorkamp, M., Torka, N., Groeneveld, S., & Groeneveld, C. (2010). How to Support Innovative Behaviour? The Role of LMX and Satisfaction with HR Practices. Technology and Investment, 01(01), 59–68.
Teece, D., Peteraf, M., Leih, S., 2016. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. Calif. Manage. Rev. 58 (4), 13–35.
Thierry Volery, Liudmila Tarabashkina, The impact of organisational support, employee creativity and work centrality on innovative work behaviour. Journal of Business Research, Volume 129,2021, Pages 295-303, ISSN 0148-2963, https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.049. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0148296321001399)
Waller, Robert & Lemoine, Pamela & Mense, Evan & Garretson, Christopher & Richardson, Michael. (2019). Global Higher Education in a VUCA World: Concerns and Projections. Journal of Education and Development. 3. 73. 10.20849/jed.v3i2.613.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations. AMJ, 53(2), 323–342.
Yulianti, P. (2016). Membangun Perilaku Inovatif Dosen Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Studi Manajemen dan Bisnis. Vol 3 No.1 Tahun 2016. Page 31-39. eISSN: 24603775 | pISSN: 23559543. Universitas Trunojoyo. Madura.
Tabachnick, B.G dan Fidell, L.S. 2006. Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education, Inc. Boston.