PENERAPAN DOKTRIN BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE TERHADAP DIREKSI ANAK PERUSAHAAN BUMN (Studi Kasus : Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 121 K/Pid.Sus/2020)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The business judgment rule doctrine becomes the protector of the director of a Limited Liability Company (PT) to take actions that affect companies whose elements are regulated in Article 97 paragraph (5) of Law Number 40 of 2007. Decision Number 121 K/Pid.Sus/2020 there are differences in the views of the first and second level courts in deciding the case of Defendant KA and other directors, the Supreme Court stated that this action was a business decision that must be protected this doctrine, this shows das sollen and das sein which need to be discussed in this study.The objectives of this study are: (1) How is the application of the business judgment rule in relation to the corporate actions of directors of BUMN subsidiaries; (2) How is the application of the business judgment rule doctrine in legal considerations in relation to the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision Number 121 K/Pid.Sus/2020. Based on the research results it is known: (1) The application of the business judgment rule doctrine to the actions of the directors of a BUMN subsidiary in BMG Australia transactions fulfills all the elements of the doctrine; (2) The application of the business judgment rule doctrine in the a quo has applied the business judgment rule doctrine from its considerations which state that the KA and other Company Directors develop the company by means of increasing oil and gas reserves so that it is protected by this doctrine as stipulated in Article 97 paragraph (5) of the Company Law .
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku
Lewis D. Solomon, et.al., Corporation Law and Policy Materials and Problems, 3rd Ed., American Casebook Series, (St.Paul, Minn : West Publishing Co., 1994).
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Jakarta: Rajagrafindo, 2010).
Jurnal
Fauzia Putri Sulaeman, “Analisis Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Pengelolaan BUMN PT Pertamina”, Jurnal Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, Vol.2, No.1, 2022.
Julio Thimotius Kapitan Smaud Natun, “Status Kepemilikan Anak Perusahaan BUMN”, Jurnal Mimbar Keadilan, Vol. 12, no.1, 2017
Leni Anggraeni, “Status Kepemilikan Anak Perusahaan Bumn”, Jurnal Al Intifa, vol.2, no.1, 2020.
Moch Arif Mirahadisaputro,et al. “Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Hukum Anak Perusahaan BUMN Terhadap Perusahaan Induk.(Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 21 P/HUM/2017 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Nomor: 01/PHPU-PRES/XVII/2019).”, Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, vol. 5, no.8, 2022.
Rizky Novian Hartono, et.al, “Kerugian Keuangan Negara pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) dalam Perspektif Doktrin Business Judgement Rule”, Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora Keluwih, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2021.
Website
Aji Prasetyo, “Ajukan Dissenting Opinion dalam Putusan Karen, Hakim Ini Gunakan Dalil Bussiness Judgment Rule”, melalui: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ajukan-idissenting-opinion-i-dalam-putusan-karen--hakim-ini-gunakan-dalil-ibussiness-judgment-rule-i-lt5cfef3159dcbd/?page=2
Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, “Business Judgement Rule,” diakses 27 September 2021, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/business_judgment_rule.
Pertamina Hulu Energi, “Profil Perusahaan”, melalui: https://phe.pertamina.com/ContentView.aspx?MenuID=ydRRTTxkdt6Trx91pX1+cA==&TypeGroupContent=mELirpUhRYksFj7k8/XBcQ==&NewsCatID=9OYR9kUytIsLilKZieD5xg== diakses tanggal 30 November 2022.
Renville Amatsier, “Blok BMG bukan Pepesan Kosong (Final?)”, melalui: https://mediaindonesia.com/opini/253217/blok-bmg-bukan-pepesan-kosong-final
Yunita Amalia, “Hakim Bebaskan Karen Agustiawan dari Uang Pengganti”, melalui: https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/hakim-bebaskan-karen-agustiawan-dari-uang-pengganti.html
E. Lain-Lain
Ayu Paramita, Saut Parulian Panjaitan, and Iza Rumesten. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara Terhadap Kerugian Keuangan Negara.” PhD Dissertation., Sriwijaya University, 2020.
Esther Kurnia. "Perbandingan Penerapan Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Direksi di Negara di Negara Indonesia dan Australia/oleh Esther Kurnia." PhD Disssertatiion., Universitas Tarumanagara, 2011.
Frans Affandi, Business Judgment Rule Dikaitkan dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara terhadap Keputusan Bisnis yang Diambil, Tesis, (Medan: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2015).
Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG), Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia, (Jakarta Tahun 2006 Diakses 25 Maret 2019)