Perlindungan Pengguna Jasa Penitipan Hewan Peliharaan Terhadap Kelalaian Pelaku Usaha Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Main Article Content
Abstract
Consumers get the protection which is regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Article 7 letter A contains that business actors are obliged to have good faith will in carrying out their business activities related to the objective of establishing consumer protection, namely creating a quality business world. In fact, the goal of consumer protection has not been achieved optimally, because it can be seen that the high number of cases related to consumer protection as resulted in an imbalance between business actors and consumers. An imbalance occurred in the case of a dog named Maxi of the English Bulldog race who was injured and had to be operated on due to negligence caused by the business actor as animal care for consumers as users of animal care services. This case relates to consumer protection which caused the consumer to suffer losses and agreement that was violated by business actors causing negligence. The application of consumer protection that is not in line with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection creates problems. This research is normative legal research. The results of the research show that there are consumer rights that have been harmed and have not yet been fulfilled based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and that regulations are needed to support the protection of animal care.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku
Hasbullah, Frieda Husni. Hukum Kebendaan Perdata Hak-Hak yang Memberikan Kenikmatan. Jakarta: Ind. Hill Co, 2002.
Miru, Ahmad dan Sakka Pati. Hukum Perjanjian Penjelasan Makna Pasal-Pasal Perjanjian Bernama dalam KUHPerdata (BW). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020.
Sasongko, Wahyu. Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2007.
Soerso, R. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Wulandari, Andi Sri Rezky dan Nurdiyana Tadjuddin, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media, 2018.
Perarturan Perundang-Undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945.
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2009 tentang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2009 tentang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan.
Artikel Jurnal Online
Brahmanta, Dewa Gede Ari Yudha dan Anak Agung Sri Utari. “Hubungan Hukum Pelaku Usaha Dengan Konsumen”. Kertha Semaya. Volume 5 Nomor 1 (2017). Diakses tanggal 20 November 2022.
Hanefa, Billy Dicko Stepanus. “Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Lisan Apabila Terjadi Wanprestasi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor 44/Pdt.G/2015/Pn.YYK)”. Privat Law Universitas Sebelas Maret. Volume 6 Nomor 2 (2016). Diakses tanggal 20 November 2022.
Nafila, Farzana dan Wardah. “Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Pada Jasa Penitipan Hewan di Banda Aceh”. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Volume 22 Nomor 2 (2020). Diakses tanggal 19 November 2022.
Pradyani, I Gusti Ayu Ratih, et al. “Perjanjian Baku Dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen”. Kertha Semaya. Volume 6 Nomor 2 (2018). Diakses tanggal 21 November 2022.
Prasadana, Gede Bagus Adhi dan Dewa Gde Rudy. “Ganti Rugi Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Penggunaan Jasa Penitipan Hewan di Kota Denpasar”. Kertha Semaya. Volume 6, Nomor 1 (2017). Diakses tanggal 21 November 2022.
Website
Anonim. “Kontrak Lisan & Tidak Dibuat Secara Tertulis, Apakah Tetap Legal?”. https://libera.id/blogs/kontrak-lisan-tetap-legal/. Diakses tanggal 21 November 2022.
Anonim. “Petisi Anjing Tewas di Pet Shop Diteken Lebih dari 25 Ribu Orang”. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220522073011-20-799593/petisi-anjing-tewas-di-pet-shop-diteken-lebih-dari-25-ribu-orang. Diakses tanggal 19 November 2022.
Rahmadani, Fitria. “Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Lisan”, https://www.msplawfirm.co.id/kekuatan-hukum-perjanjian-lisan/. Diakses pada 21 November 2022.