URGENSI PENYELESAIAN KASUS BANTUAN LIKUIDITAS BANK INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 10 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PERBANKAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1555K/PID.SUS/2019)

Main Article Content

Aldo Evander Wijaya
Jeane Neltje Saly

Abstract

The BLBI case is indeed quite complex to handle, considering that there were two BPK audit results in 2006 and 2017 with different results, especially regarding the presence or absence of state financial losses as an element of corruption. The problem faced is how the impact of uncertainty in rescuing the BLBI case on the future of investment in Indonesia and how urgency to resolve the Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance case based on Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking related to the Supreme Court's Decision Number 1555 K/Pid.Sus/2019. The research method used in writing this scientific paper is a normative juridical research method. The results of the study indicate that the impact of uncertainty in rescuing the BLBI case on the future of investment in Indonesia is investor distrust of the investment climate in Indonesia, given the long-winded and time-consuming BLBI settlement. The urgency of resolving the Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance case based on Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking related to the Supreme Court Decision Number 1555 K/Pid.Sus/2019 is through the MSAA mechanism with Release and Discharge clauses and MRNIA, but in reality this has implications for various irregularities by the obligor or the BLBI receiving banks. In order to recover the state financial loss of Rp. 108 trillion to the State treasury, the government uses a civil lawsuit on the basis of the Asset Confiscation Law.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

A. Buku

Center For Financial Policy Studies. Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia. (Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2000).

Center For Strategic and International Studies, Kliping Dunia Ekuin dan Perbankan, (Jakarta: CSIS, 2000).

Effendi, Marwan. Korupsi dan Pencegahan. (Jakarta: Timpani Publishing, 2010).

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

_______. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2001 Nomor 134, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4150.

_______. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4286.

_______. Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1998 Nomor 182, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3790.

_______. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 39/PID.SUS/TPK/2018/PN.JKT.PST.

_______. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Nomor 29/PID.SUS-TPK/2018/PT.DKI.

_______. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1555 K/Pid.Sus/2019.

C. Jurnal

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011).Amiziduhu Mendrofa, “Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Era Reformasi; Konsep Dan Regulasi”, Jurnal Litigasi, Vol. 16 (1), 2015.

D. Internet

Mukti, Syahrul Ansyari Fajar Ginanjar. “Kerugian BLBI Ditanggung Seluruh Rakyat Indonesia”, www.viva.co.id, diakses 13 April 2021.