PENGGUNAAN SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN YANG DISERTAI DENGAN KEKERASAN (STUDI KASUS NO 563/PID.B/2019/PN.JKT.BRT)

Main Article Content

Ahmad Aryadi
R Rahaditya

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the use of crown witnesses in criminal acts that often occur in the prosecution process in court as evidence in cases witnessed by the defendants, especially in cases of theft accompanied by violence. This research was conducted with a normative research approach and with data collection, one of which was by conducting interviews with the defendants and also their families as a data collection technique and also literature study obtained from the prevailing laws and regulations, books, jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, as well as Supreme Court Circular Letters, journals, and internet sites. The results of this study indicate that the use of crown witnesses in evidence in Indonesia is often used, initially the reason for using crown witnesses was as evidence against the public against the crime that occurred, but along with the times the crown witnesses should be accompanied by sufficient evidence to prove that the defendant is a people who are truly proven to have committed a criminal act, the need for legal protection related to the improvement of the Criminal Procedure Code, especially the affirmation of the use of crown witnesses, is needed, legal protection by providing an understanding of the human rights of people who have been harmed due to misunderstandings caused by the dualism of understanding of Jurisprudence as one a source of law that has permanent legal force, so that the purpose of law, namely to establish order and balance in society can be achieved.


Article Details

Section
Articles

References

BUKU

Alfitra, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Beracara Pidana, perdata dan Korupsi di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses,2011).

C.S.T. Kansil, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2015), cetakan ke-IX.

Hamzah, Andi, Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Tentang Pelaksanaan Asas Oportunitas dalam Hukum Acara pidana, (Jakarta: BPHN, 2006).

Hiariej, Eddy O.S, 2012, Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Moersaleh, Pedoman Membuat Skripsi, (Jakarta: CV Haji Masagung, 1989).

Nazir, Moh, Metode Penulisan Cetakan ke-3, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1988).

Sudaryono dan Natangsa Surbakti, 2005, Hukum Pidana, (Surakarta: MUP).

Sasangko, Hari, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003).

Sasangko, Hari dan Lily Rosita, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana untuk Mahasiswa dan Praktisi, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003).

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1985).

Waluyo, Bambang, Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1991).

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 tentang Perlakuan Bagi Pelapor Tindak Pidana.

Surat Edaran Kejaksaan Agung Nomor B-69/E/02/1997 tentang Hukum pembuktian dalam perkara pidana.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1986K/Pid/1989.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1174 K/Pid/1994.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2437K/PID.SUS/2011.

Kamus

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia: pengertian Saksi.

Internet

Albert Aries, S.H., M.H., Perbedaan Saksi Mahkota dengan Justice Collaborator, 2017, http://www.hukumonline.com/, diakses 28 September 2020.

Ilman Hadi, Definisi Saksi Mahkota, 2012, http://www.hukumonline.com/, diakses 28 September 2020.