ANALISIS TERHADAP DISPENSASI KAWIN YANG DIAJUKAN SENDIRI OLEH PEMOHON YANG BELUM CAKAP HUKUM (STUDI PUTUSAN : NOMOR 198/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Pwd).

Main Article Content

Bunga Sakura
Mia Hadiati

Abstract

Marriage is a strong and firm agreement to live together legally between a man and a woman where the ideal marriage is a marriage in which both partners reach sufficient age. However, when one of the partners or both parties do not reach the age for marriage, the next step is to apply for a marriage dispensation. In this paper, there is a problem that will be discussed, namely how the status of the prospective bride and groom as an exempted marriage dispensation applicant.The purpose of this paper is to understand the status of the prospective bride and groom as an exempted marriage dispensation applicant. The research method used in this study is the normative research method. The research data was collected by means of literature study through the method of approaching laws and interviews. Then analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. In terms of the status of the prospective bride and groom as an exempted marriage dispensation applicant is not legally competent. Child may not be the Petitioner in court because considering his age is still not legally competent. Court decisions made by judges have a major role in changing behavior and increasing legal awareness. It is necessary to have a common ground between the child protection law and the marriage law.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Buku

Abdulkadir, Muhammad. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000).

Amir, Syarifuddin. Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006).

Arto, Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. cetakan ke-5. (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar,2004).

Asikin, Dr. Amiruddin. dan Prof Dr. H. Zainal. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan ke-9. (Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016).

E, Sumaryono. Etika Profesi Hukum: Norma-norma Bagi Penegak Hukum.(Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1995).

Fuady, Munir. Konsep Hukum Perdata. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014).

Ghozali, Abdul Rahman. Fiqh Munakahat. (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2003).

Gultom, Maidin. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak. Cetakan Ke-2. (Bandung, P.T.Refika Aditama, 2010).

Idris Ramulyo, Hukum Perkawinan Islam, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2002)

Iskandar, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial (kuantitatif dan kualitatif), cetakan ke-1, (Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press, 2008).

Kansil, C.S.T. Modul Hukum Perdata, (Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita, 1995).

Marwan Mas, “Pengantar Ilmu Hukum”, ( Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia, 2004).

Marzuki. dan Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2009).

Mas, Marwan. “Pengantar Ilmu Hukum”.( Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia, 2004).

Matlub, Abdul Majid Mahmud. Panduan Hukum Keluarga Sakinah. (Solo: Era Intermedia, 2005).

Miriam Budiarjo, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik (Jakarta: Gramedia, 1982).

Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, cetakan ke-5, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar,2004).

R. Subekti. dan R. Tjitrosoedibyo. Kamus Hukum (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha, 1996).

_______________________________. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2001).

Ramulyo, Moh. Idris. Hukum Perkawinan Islam: Suatu Analisis dari Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara,1996).

Soekanto, M. Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta : UI Press,2006).

Soemiyati. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan ( No. 1 Tahun 1974 ) (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007).

Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, (Bandung, Alumni, 1986).

Zainal, Asikin. Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia. (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2012).

Artikel Jurnal Online

Dwisvimiar, Inge, “Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Hukum”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.11 No. 3, 2011, (hal. 528)

Xavier Nugraha, “Rekonstruksi Batas Usia Minimal Perkawinan Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan (Analisa Putusan MK No. 22/PUU-XV/2017),” Lex Scientia Law Review, Vol. 3 No. 3 Mei 2019.