ANALISIS KEPASTIAN SUMBER HUKUM PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP DELIK ABORSI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINGGI JAMBI NOMOR 6/PID.SUS-ANAK/2018)

Main Article Content

Rosita Rosita
Rugun Romaida Hutabarat

Abstract

The discussion articulated in this research material is on the subject of uncertainty of legal source relating to passing of sentencingin cases involving  abortion offense under the criminal justice system (as applied in the Jambi High Court Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus-Anak /2018) and the Court’s application on sentencing for such  offenses. The primary material used for this research analysis is juridical normative, therefore the sources of data used by the author is primary data fromlaws and regulations, including positive Indonesian law, secondary data from literature studies and various literatures and tertiary data, namely, dictionaries, media and encyclopedias. The materials and data were collected from research conducted from well-equipped legal libraries / authorities. The judge's decision purporting that the perpetrator is held free from abortion offense in cases involving rape victims is somewhat ambiguousunder the existing Criminal Code and Laws, and this ambiguity should be analyzed in the light of law Number 36 of 2009 which concerns health and specifically under Indonesian positive law which adheres to the doctrine of “lex specialis derogat legi generalis” (“special law repeals general laws”). In addition, there is also legal uncertainty involving abortion offense due to the existence of a large number of legal sources or references to articles that regulate abortion offenses. In order for victims of rape and medical emergencies not to be considered ascriminals, the provisions in the Criminal Code and the Health Law must be uniformedto complement each other.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Buku

Bandra Nawawi Arif, Reformasi Sistem Peradilan/ Sistem Penegakan Hukum, Edisi Revisi, (Semarang: Universitas DIponegoro, 2011).

Dadang Hawari, Aborsi Dimensi Psikoreligi, (Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran UI, 2006).

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Asas Legalitas & Penemuan Hukum Dalam Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Erlangga, 2009).

K. Bertens, Aborsi Sebagai Masalah Etika, (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2001).

Maria Ulfah Anshor, Fikih Aborsi: Wacana Penguatan Hak Reproduksi Perempuan, (Jakarta: UI, 2002).

Muhammad Erwin, Filsafat Hukum, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2012).

Nomensen Sinamo, Hukum Kesehatan & Sengketa Medik, Cetakan ke-1 (Jakarta: Puri Gading PGR 160 Pondok Gede Bekasi, 2019).

Poerwadarminta, W.J.S, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1995).

Samsul Ramri dan Fahrurazi, Bacaan Wajib Swakelola Pengadaan Barang/Jasa, (Jakarta: Visimedia Pustaka).

Sudarto, Hukum Pidana 1, (Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto, 1990).

Peraturan PerUndang-Undangan

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Laporan Akhir Tim Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, (Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI Tahun 2010).

________, Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 61, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5063).