Discourse Network Analysis on detikcom and KOMPAS.com on Nuclear Power Plants Construction in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 65
Download : 31
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to determine the emerging discourse regarding the construction of nuclear power plants (PLTN) in Indonesia on detikcom and KOMPAS.com as online news media platforms from media conglomerates from 1 August 2022 to 31 August 2023, while also comparing and finding differences in the existing discourse by using the Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) method. The construction of nuclear power plants is in line with the target for nuclear needs in Indonesia to start in 2040 according to the government's energy roadmap through the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, and the global urgency that nuclear power is an alternative clean energy to replace fossil energy in line with the energy transition to achieve the target of zero carbon emissions by 2060. This research showed that the emerging discourse from all news articles on detikcom and KOMPAS.com is supportive of the government to build nuclear power plants in Indonesia. Due to the government's perspective used in the research, the media actually controlled by media conglomerates and politicians have tended to support all programs promoted by the government. It has influenced the news in the owned media or which under the control of these media conglomerates.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.References
Abe, Y. (2015). The nuclear power debate after Fukushima: a text-mining analysis of Japanese newspapers. Contemporary Japan, 27(2), 89–110.
Alekseev, P. N., Gagarinskii, A. Y., Kalugin, M. A., Kukharkin, N. E., Semchenkov, Y. M., Sidorenko, V. A., Subbotin, S. A., Teplov, P. S., Fomichenko, P. A., & Asmolov, V. G. (2019). On a Strategy for the Development of Nuclear Power in Russia. Atomic Energy, 126, 207–212.
Bol’Shov, L. A., & Linge, I. I. (2020). Strategy for the development of nuclear energy in russia and environmental matters. Atomic Energy, 127, 333–338.
Eriyanto. (2022). Analisis Jejaring Wacana: Konsep, Metode, dan Aplikasi untuk Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi, Politik, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya.
Eriyanto, A. (2020). Discourse network of a public issue debate: A study on covid-19 cases in indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 209–227.
Fergie, G., Leifeld, P., Hawkins, B., & Hilton, S. (2019). Mapping discourse coalitions in the minimum unit pricing for alcohol debate: a discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage. Addiction, 114(4), 741–753.
Herawati, N., & Sudagung, A. D. (2020). Persepsi Masyarakat dan Potensi Public Acceptance Terkait Wacana Pembangunan PLTN di Kabupaten Bengkayang. Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir, 22(2), 111–117.
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2010). Media industry studies, media production studies. Media and Society, 5, 145–164.
Leifeld, P. (2017). Discourse network analysis. The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, 301–326.
Leifeld, P. (2020). Policy debates and discourse network analysis: A research agenda. Politics and Governance, 8(2), 180–183.
Lv, H. (2020). Design and implementation of domestic news collection system based on Python. 2020 Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers (IPEC), 301–303.
Markard, J., Rinscheid, A., & Widdel, L. (2021). Analyzing transitions through the lens of discourse networks: Coal phase-out in Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 315–331.
Matta, P., Sharma, S., & Uniyal, N. (2022). Comparative Study Of Various Scraping Tools: Pros And Cons. 2022 IEEE Delhi Section Conference (DELCON), 1–5.
Muller, A. (2015). Using discourse network analysis to measure discourse coalitions: Towards a formal analysis of political discourse. World Political Science, 11(2), 377–404.
Office of Nuclear Energy. (2020, July 6). 5 Things Netflix Got Wrong about Nuclear Power in its History 101 Series.
Portelli, A. (2017). What cultural objects say about nuclear accidents and their way of depicting a controversial industry. Resilience: A New Paradigm of Nuclear Safety: From Accident Mitigation to Resilient Society Facing Extreme Situations, 137–156.
Reuters Institute, & University of Oxford. (2023, June 21). Digital News Report 2023. Reutersinstitute.Politics.Ox.Ac.Uk.
Rinscheid, A. (2015). Crisis, policy discourse, and major policy change: Exploring the role of subsystem polarization in nuclear energy policymaking. European Policy Analysis, 1(2), 34–70.
Sharonova, Y. M., & Sharma, D. (2016). Nuclear Power Discourse Analysis: A Literature Review. International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies (IJHSSS) A Peer-Reviewed Bi-Monthly Bi-Lingual Research Journal, 3(2), 167–177.
Sugiono, S. (2020). ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS TERHADAP DISKURSUS PEMBANGUNAN PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK TENAGA NUKLIR DI MEDIA ONLINE. Jurnal Komunikasi Universitas Garut: Hasil Pemikiran Dan Penelitian, 6(2), 530–546.
Sum, N.-L., & Jessop, B. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy: Putting culture in its place in political economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sumirat, P. A., & Eriyanto, E. (2023). Koalisi Wacana dalam Debat Pemekaran Papua: Analisis Jaringan Wacana Debat Pemekaran Tiga Provinsi Baru di Papua. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 6(2), 1–20.
Susanto, E. H. (2017). Media Massa, Pemerintah dan Pemilik Modal. Jurnal Aspikom, 1(6), 477–484.
Tempo.com. (2022, November 29). Soal PLTN Indonesia, Perusahaan Energi Nuklir Rusia: Tak Perlu Tunggu 2040.