Transformation Model for Online Trials at the Bekasi District Court
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 43
Download : 55
Main Article Content
Abstract
During the pandemic, law enforcement was carried out online in many courts around the world, including the Indonesian courts. The implementation of this online trial involves law enforcement as the party conducting the online trial. There are many challenges faced related to how online trials are managed, changing law enforcement procedures, including how technology is used in trials by law enforcers to support trials, however online trials are still implemented through the support of communication processes. This research aims to describe the transformation process carried out by law enforcers during the implementation of online trial communication. The concepts used are trial transformation, communication and diffusion of innovation. This research was conducted qualitatively using a phenomenological approach, the researcher conducted interviews with 7 informants consisting of 2 judges, 3 prosecutors and 2 legal advisors, the researcher also conducted analysis on archived online trial recording documents. The results of this research show that online trials are carried out as an implication of physical and social restriction policies, as well as a form of developing online-based trial services. The transformation process carried out by law enforcers during the implementation of online trial communication is carried out using two transformation models, namely the personal transformation model and the institutional transformation model. Success in implementing online trials as a form of transformation is influenced by the quality of infrastructure, law enforcement literacy, communication established between parties, namely communication between institutions, including the court, prosecutor's office, police, and law offices.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Jurnal Komunikasi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.References
Amarini, I., Saefudin, Y., Kartini, I. A., Marsitiningsih, & Ismail, N. (2023). Digital Transformation: Creating an Effective and Efficient Court in Indonesia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(2), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.28013
Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja. (2020). Perkembangan Regulasi Dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan online di indonesia dan amerika serikat selama pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Crepido, 02, 46–58.
Cashman, P., & Ginnivan, E. (2019). Digital Justice: Online Resolution of Minor Civil Disputes and the Use of Digital Technology in Complex Litigation and Class Actions. Macquarie Law Journal, cl, 39–79. https://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/digital-
Creswell, J. W. (2010a). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
Creswell, J. W. (2010b). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
Djamaludin, Aziz, M. F., Ar-Rasyid, Y., & As-Sayyis, I. A. (2023). Assessing the Impact of Electronic Court Systems on the Efficiency of Judicial Processes in the Era of Digital Transformation. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.8082
Fadilla, A. N., & Meirinawati. (2016). Inovasi Layanan Informasi Perkara Gerbang Pesan Singkat (Gps) Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Di Pengadilan Agama Mojokerto. Ilmu Administrasi Negara, FISH, UNESA, 4(10), 1–9.
Hidayat, F. A. M., & Ibrahim, A. L. (2023). Disharmoni Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Disabilitas Mental Dalam Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. JUSTISI, 9(3), 326-343.
Husin, Kadri;Husin Budi, R. (2022). Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Iswantoro, W. (2020). Persidangan Pidana Secara Online, Respon Cepat MA Hadapi Pandemi Covid-19. Selisik, 6(1), 56–63. http://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/selisik/article/download/1705/1015/
Khoirul Majid, M. E., Ainayyah, N. H., & Amrina, N. (2019). Optimalisasi Sistem Layanan Pengadilan Berbasis Elektronik Guna Menjamin Keterbukaan Informasi Menuju Peradilan Yang Modern. Legislatif, 3(1), 97–115. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jhl/article/view/10209
Korobeinikova, T. (2021). E-Justice: The State Of Implementation In Russian Federation. https://doi.org/10.15405/EPSBS.2021.03.19
Kuswarno, E. (2007). Tradisi fenomenologi pada penelitian komunikasi kualitatif sebuah pedoman penelitian dari pengalaman penelitian. Sosiohumaniora, 9(2), 161.
Lestari, T. Y., & Hayati, A. A. S. (2023). Implementasi Asas Peradilan Terbuka untuk Umum pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Donggala. Journal on Education, 5(4).
Ligasetiawan, E., & Nelson, F. M. (2022). Prinsip Kehadiran Terdakwa pada Persidangan Pidana Elektronik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Perbandingan Indonesia dan Belanda. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.1.69-103
Mahkamah Agung. (2020). PERMA_NOMOR_4_TAHUN_2020_1.pdf.
Mulyana, D. (2017). METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATTIF : Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nisrokha, N. (2020). Difusi Inovasi dalam Teknologi Pendidikan. Madaniyah, 0(2), 173-184.
Noveck, B. S. (2019). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press.
Putri, M. C., & Sinaga, E. M. C. (2021). Disrupsi Digital Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 10(1), 79.
Putri, T. U., Azisa, N., & Mirzana, H. A. (2021). Pelaksanaan Sidang Virtual Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19 Oleh Penuntut Umum Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Barru. HERMENEUTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu …, 5(2).
Rusmiarti, D. A. (2015). Analisis difusi inovasi dan pengembangan budaya kerja pada organisasi birokrasi. Jurnal Masyarakat Telematika Dan Informasi, 6(2), 85-100.
Safitri, D., & Waluyo, B. (2021). Optimalisasi Kebijakan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Secara Elektronik Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. JUSTITIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 279-287.
Santuber, J. (2021). Delivering Digital Justice : Liminal Innovation & Permanence in Courts Australasian Conference on Information Systems Delivering Digital Justice : Liminal Innovation & Permanence in Courts Full research paper Christoph Meinel. December.
Saputra, R., Zaid, M., & Emovwodo, S. O. (2022). The Court Online Content Moderation: A Constitutional Framework. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 2(3), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i3.54
Schmitz, A. J. (2019). Expanding access to remedies through e-court initiatives. Buffalo Law Review, 67(1), 89–163.
Setiawan, A. D., & Putri, S. A. (2021). Implementasi Sistem E-Court Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 2(2), 198-217.
Sourdin, T., Li, B., & McNamara, D. M. (2020). Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology, 9(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sutjipto, A. M., & Pinariya, J. M. (2019). Pengenalan Vaksinasi Hpv Oleh Koalisi Indonesia Cegah Kanker Serviks Dengan Pendekatan Teori Difusi Inovasi. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2), 203-214.
Syarifuddin, M. (2020). Transformasi Digital Persidangan di Era New Normal: melayani Pencari Keadilan di masa Pandemi Covid-19. (1st ed.). PT.Imaji Cipta Karya.
Widodo, A., Hidayat, D. R., Venus, A., & Suseno, S. (2018). Communication and service quality in public sector: An ethnographic study of a state court of justice in Jakarta. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17553
Widodo, Aan. (2020). Model Komunikasi Pemeriksaan Dalam Sidang Agenda Pembuktian Perkara di Pengadilan. Jurnal Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v12i2.8447
Widodo, Aan, Rahmat Hidayat, D., Venus, A., & Suseno, S. (2018). The Pattern of Communication Legal Advisor with Defendant In Indonesian Courtroom. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 405. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18343
Winn, P. A. (2004). Online court records: Balancing judicial accountability and privacy in an age of electronic information. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 307–329.
Xia, Y. (2023). On the Cross-Examination of Criminal Cases in Online Court. Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-092-3_63