Paradigm Shift of Beauty In Landscape Design: Strategies Towards 'Big Foot’ Aesthetic

Main Article Content

Lucia Indah Pramanti

Abstract

Human perception about beauty always mirrors civilization, and is embodied in their built environment. In other words, what people sees as beautiful plays a crucial role towards how nature/landscape is developed. This paper intentions are to rethink on contemporary aesthetic value in landscape design, to evaluate current aesthetic paradigm, and to find landscape design strategies that can promote sustainable goals.  Using qualitative method, this paper first shows historical review on how landscape form through many centuries in both western and eastern civilization. Later, it examines on how contemporary landscapes are built. In the discussion, it is found that -using Chinese foot binding tradition as a metaphor– our contemporary landscape is designed to be unusable, unhealthy, unproductive ‘small feet’. Landscape is designed with beautification – merely for visual properties, not for human activity, destructing the natural properties of landscape, and too difficult to maintain. Human should be able to interact with the nature in landscape in order to create a behavioral changes towards the nature. As a conclusion, we need to shift our paradigm of beauty towards healthy ‘big foot’ aesthetic to be a direction on how to achieve the sustainable beauty. This ‘big foot’ aesthetic can be relevant not only in landscape design, but also in other fields related to the built environment.

Keywords: landscape design, sustainability, green design, aesthetic value

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Bluestone, Daniel M. "Detroit's city beautiful and the problem of commerce." Journal of the

Society of Architectural Historians 47.3 (1988): 245-262.

Bokenkamp, Stephen R. "The Peach Flower Font and the Grotto Passage." Journal of the

American Oriental Society 106.1 (1986): 65-77.

Boults, Elizabeth, and Chip Sullivan. Illustrated history of landscape design. John Wiley &

Sons, 2010.

Department of Asian Art. Chinese Gardens and Collectors’ Rocks. In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art

History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–.

http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/cgrk/hd_cgrk.htm (Oct 2004)

Dictionary, Oxford English. "Oxford English Dictionary." The Library (2002).

Dixon Hunt, John. "Picturesque & the America of William Birch ‘The singular excellence of

Britain for picture scenes’."

Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed

Landscapes

1 (2012): 3-14.

Howett, Catherine. "Systems, signs, sensibilities: sources for a new landscape

aesthetic." Landscape Journal 6.1 (1987): 1-12.

Jacobs, Jane. The death and life of great American cities. Vintage, 2016.

Meyer, Elizabeth K. "Sustaining beauty: The performance of appearance (Reprinted from'Journal

of Landscape Architecture', Spring 2008)." Landscape architecture 98.10 (2008): 92.

Powers, Alan. Robin Hood Gardens Re-visions. The Twentieth Century Society/Paul Holberton

Publishing, 2010.

Saunders, William S., ed. Designed ecologies: The landscape architecture of Kongjian Yu.

Walter de Gruyter, 2013.

Spirn, Anne Whiston. "The poetics of city and nature: Towards a new aesthetic for urban

design." Landscape Journal 7.2 (1988): 108-126.

Stelter, Gilbert. "Rethinking the significance of the city beautiful idea." Urban Planning in a

Changing World: The Twentieth Century Experience (2000): 98-117.Varley, Peter, and Dominic Medway. "Ecosophy and tourism: Rethinking a mountain

resort." Tourism Management 32.4 (2011): 902-911.

Ward, Andrew. Assessment of Garden City Planning Principles in the ACT. Department of