MULTI CRITERIA SUPPLIER SELECTION USING A HYBRID FUZZY AHP- TAGUCHI TECHNIQUE: THE CASE OF TEXTILE INDUSTRY

Article Sidebar

DOWNLOAD
Published: Sep 5, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/jitiuntar.v8i2.9152
Keywords:
Supplier Selection, , Fuzzy AHP, Taguchi Loss Function
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 493
Download : 440
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

Wilson Kosasih
Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Tarumanagara
Vieren Yulies Triyani
Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Tarumanagara
Ahmad Ahmad
Carla Olyvia Doaly
Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Tarumanagara

Abstract

This paper discusses a method that integrates Fuzzy AHP with Taguchi Loss Function. The method used to select suppliers with various criteria. This various criteria will be considered to get the best supplier. This research was conducted at a textile company in Indonesia for the cotton product 41166. The purpose of this research is to apply techniques to improve the performance of Fuzzy AHP by considering the cost of losses as small as possible. Research data obtained from the survey results using questionnaires and company factual data in the form of costs of losses incurred due to improper quantity of raw materials, quality of raw materials that are not in accordance with standards, delays in delivery, prices that exceed expectations, and poor service or response. The results of this research shown the value of losses incurred by 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th suppliers respectively for $ 2.23, $ 671.12, $ 815.57, and $ 1243.64. Among four suppliers, the best supplier with the smallest loss value is first supplier.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri (Jurnal Keilmuan Teknik dan Manajemen Industri)
Section
Articles

All publications by Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Indsutri (Jurnal Keilmuan Teknik dan Manajemen Industri ) [p-ISSN: 2337-5841, e-ISSN: 2355-6528] is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Wilson Kosasih, Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Tarumanagara

 

References

Xia, Weijun & Zhiming, W. 2007. Supplier Selection with Multiple Criteria in Volume Discount Environments. Int J Mgmt Sci., 35(5), pp. 494–504.

Bayazit, O., Birsen, K. & Ayhan, Y.A. 2006. Purchasing Decision: Selecting a Supplier for a Construction Company. Journal System Science System Engineering (Springer-Verlag), 15(2), pp. 217-231.

Saaty, T.L. & Vargas, L.G. 2012. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York, US: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 1-39.

Indrapriyatna, Ahmad S, Meuthia, Y., Fatrias, D. & Gusti, M. 2011. Integrasi Taguchi Loss Function dengan Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process dalam Pemilihan Pemasok. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 13(2), pp. 66-72.

Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H. & O’Brien, C. 2006. Fuzzy Multiobjective Linear Model for Supplier Selection in A Supply Chain. International Journal Production Economics, 104, pp. 394-407.

Kosasih, W. 2016. Fuzzy Assessment Simulation for Classifying Production Equipment in Practice of Total Productive Maintenance. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(8), pp. 5261-5268.

Ozdagoglu, A. & Ozdagoglue, G. 2007. Comparisons of AHP and Fuzzy AHP for the Multi-Crtieria Decision Making Processes with Linguistic Evaluations. Istanbul Ticret University Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(11), pp. 65-85.

Chang, D. Y. 1996. Applications of The Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Jurnal of Operational Research, 95, pp 649-655. [9]. Saaty, T. L. 1993. Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin, Proses Hirarki Analitik untuk Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Situasi yang Kompleks. ID: Pustaka Binama Pressindo.

Zimmermann, H. J. 1978. Fuzzy Programming and Linear Programming with Several Objective Functions. Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, pp. 45-55.

Kahraman, Cengiz, Cebeci, Ufuk & Ulukan, Ziya. 2004. Multi-attribute Comparison of Catering Service Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: The Case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), pp.171-184.

Lam, Ka-Chi, Lam, Mike Chun-Kit & Wang, D. 2008. MBNQA-Oriented Self Assessment Quality Management System for Contractors: Fuzzy AHP Approach. Journal construction management and economics, 26, pp. 447-461.

Chang, Da-Yong. 1996. Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operation Research, 95, p. 649.

Chuang, M.L. & Liou, J.H. 2008. A Hybrid MCDM model for evaluating the corporate image of the airline industry. International Journal of Applied Management Science, 1, pp. 41-54.

Chiou, Hua-Kai, Wan, Chia-Chin & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung. 2005. Fuzzy AHP with MCDA to construct te Roadmap of R&D Consortia in Taiwan’s M&S Enterprises. Paper presented at ISAHP 2005, Honolulu-Hawaii (pp. 1-11).

Terano, T., Asai, K. & Sugeno, M. 1992. Fuzzy System Theory and It’s Applications. London, UK: Academic Press, Inc., p. 8.

Deng, Hepu. 1999. Multi-criteria Analysis with Fuzzy Pairwise Comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, pp. 215-231.

Belavendram, Nicolo. 1995. Quality by Design: Taguchi Techniques for Industrial Expermentation. New York, US: Prentice Hall.

Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri (2020) Vol. 8 No. 1, 1 – 11

Ginting, E.S., Pujangkoro, S. & Sinaga, T.S. 2014. Evaluasi Supplier Bahan Baku Pembuatan Tiang Pancang pada PT. XYZ dengan Menggunakan AHP dan Loss Function. e-Jurnal Teknik Industri FT USU, 3(1), pp. 1-5.